Cited by 9Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth Education and Validation

Validación de la Escala de bienestar mental de Wareick-Edinburgo, en Chile

Carvajal·2015·DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Abstract

Introducción: El bienestar mental es un constructo relevante, pero ha sido poco estudiado y existen muy pocos cuestionarios para su valoración. Objetivo: Adaptar y validar la versión española de la Escala de Bienestar Mental de WarwickEdimburgo. Material y Método: Se realizó un procedimiento de validación semántica, seguido de una aplicación a 220 personas adultas para estudiar sus propiedades psicométricas. Resultados: Se introdujeron cambios semánticos mínimos. Se utilizó un análisis factorial de componentes principales, con buenos resultados (KMO= 0,897) y una muy buena consistencia interna para un factor(? = 0,875). Este cuestionario mostró una buena correlación con el GHQ- 12 y el cuestionario de calidad de vida WHOQOL-BREF. La correlación test - retest fue positiva y estadísticamente significativa (r = 0,556, p < 0,001). Conclusión: Esta escala mostró buenos indicadores psicométricos, siendo una herramienta útil y fácil de aplicar para la evaluación del bienestar mental en adultos.

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.31052/1853.1180.v19.n1.11822

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvajal
Venue
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
13-21
OpenAlex
W1771557556
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
psychological well-being, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, scale validation, Spanish adaptation, psychometric properties, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, GHQ-12, WHOQOL-BREF, quality of life, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review