Cited by 1Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Education, Practice, Research

The prevalence of overhang and gap formation in posterior amalgam and composite restorations among 4th and 5th stage undergraduate students/Tishk University

Open access
Hussein Kamel, Jabbar, Salman, Faraed Dawood·2023·Acta Scientific Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background: Overhanging approximate restoration may cause gingival aggravation periodontal tissue devastation, diminishes alveolar bone height, and recurrence of caries.Gap formation from margin of restoration may cause food impaction which leads to caries recurrence and if it happens inside restoration it will lead to weakening of restoration. Aims of the Study:The present study aims to assess the overhang and gap formation frequency in patients who visited the dental clinic of Tishk University of Medical sciences/conservative department for 4 th and 5 th grade undergraduate course. Materials and Methods:A random sample was collected from patients required class II restorations attending conservative department/dentistry college/Tishk University according to questionnaires which have been made for 4 th and 5 th grades that include personal information and type of restorative material which has been used, radiographs were taken (posterior bitewing) utilizing paralleling technique, then viewed on computer and change pictures' contrast, printed out and bound with its own questionnaire.Statistical analysis was done using chi-square test at P < 0.05 to find out the relationship.Results: There was a statistically significant association between overhang and the following parameters: gender of clinician, type of tooth, type of restoration at P < 0.05 level, while non-significant difference was found between overhang and following parameters; student's grade, gender of patient, location of tooth in jaw, and side of restoration at P > 0.05 level.For Gap Formation: There was a statistically significant association between gap formation and the following parameters: location of tooth in jaw, side of restoration, and type of restoration at P < 0.05 level.While there were non statistically significant relationships between gap formation and the following parameters: student's grade, gender of patient, gender of clinician, and type of tooth at P > 0.05 level. Conclusion:According to the present study, 20% of all surfaces that have been restored showed presence of overhang while (80%) were free from overhang, in relation to gap formation (25.6%) of restorations have gap formation while (74.4%) were free.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31080/asms.2023.07.1518

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussein Kamel, J., & Salman, F. D.
Affiliations
Erbil Polytechnic University (IQ)
Venue
Acta Scientific Medical Sciences
Published
2023-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
145-156
ISSN
2582-0931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362474835
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Scientific Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
composite resin restorations, Class II restorations, dental students, restorative dentistry, gingival margin, food impaction, secondary caries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review