The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Menstrual Blood Loss–A Population Study: Variation at different ages and attempts to define normality
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart
HIGHAM, J. M., O'BRIEN, P. M. S., & SHAW, R. W. (1990) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x · Cited by 1,116
Endocrine regulation of menstruation
Jabbour, H. N., Kelly, R. W., Fraser, H. M., & Critchley, H. O. D. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2004-0021 · Cited by 588
Diagnosis and Management of Iron-Deficiency Anaemia
COOK, J. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology · doi:10.1016/j.beha.2004.08.022 · Cited by 452
The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding
Fraser, I., Critchley, H., Broder, M., & Munro, M. (2011) · Seminars in Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1287662 · Cited by 384
Epidemiology of menstrual disorders in developing countries: a systematic review
Harlow, S. D., & Campbell, O. M. R. (2004) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00012.x · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Hallberg, L., Hôgdahl, A., Nilsson, L., & Rybo, G.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1966-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320-351
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2012165536
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Menstrual Blood Loss–A Population Study: Variation at different ages and attempts to define normality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00016346609158455
- The paper
- Hallberg, L., Hôgdahl, A., Nilsson, L., & Rybo, G. (1966). Menstrual Blood Loss–A Population Study: Variation at different ages and attempts to define normality. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016346609158455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
