Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 33Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPregnancy and Medication Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrapartum Management of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM) Gestants: A comparative study of constant intravenous insulin infusion and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (CSIIP)

Feldberg, Dov, Dicker, Dov, Samuel, Nurith, Peleg, Dan, Karp, Moshe, Goldman, Jack A., Goldman, Jack A.·1988·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Two groups of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) parturients were managed according to different intrapartum protocols and compared with a control group of normal women in labor. Thirty-seven patients received conventional intensified insulin therapy during pregnancy and intravenous continuous insulin infusion during labor. Twenty-eight women were managed by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump (CSIIP) throughout gestation and this therapeutic approach was continued during labor. When the two glucose control techniques were compared, CSIIP was superior to achieving and maintaining intrapartum optimal metabolic control, reducing significantly the incidence of acute fetal distress, thus lowering the cesarean section rate and neonatal hypoglycemia. Consequently we concur with the recommendation that firm prepartum as well as intrapartum diabetic control is mandatory for successful management of labor in IDDM patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00016348809004231

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Feldberg, D., Dicker, D., Samuel, N., Peleg, D., Karp, M., Goldman, J. A., & Goldman, J. A.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-01
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
333-338
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2162310684
Cited by
33
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, intrapartum management, insulin pump therapy, intravenous insulin infusion, glycemic control, fetal distress, cesarean section rate, neonatal hypoglycemia
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Obstetric Labor Complications, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.