Cited by 66Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Perinatal mortality and case fatality after placental abruption in Norway 1967-1991

Rasmussen, Svein, Irgens, Lorentz M., Bergsjø, Per, Dalaker, Knut·1996·Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study national secular trends in Norway of perinatal mortality and case fatality to placental abruption (PA) and associations with cesarean section (CS). DESIGN: A population based cohort study. SETTING: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. PATIENTS: 9,592 cases of placental abruption (PA) of a total of 1,446,154 births notified in Norway 1967-1991. MAIN MEASURES: Comprehensive perinatal mortality (all stillbirths > or = 16 weeks of gestation and early neonatal deaths) and standard perinatal mortality (all stillbirths > or = 28 weeks of gestation and all early neonatal deaths). Case fatality rate. MAIN RESULTS: From 1967 through 1991, the standard perinatal mortality rate due to placental abruption (PA) in Norway decreased from 2.5 per 1000 births (13.5% of all deaths) in 1967 to 0.9 (13.2%) in 1991. The comprehensive perinatal mortality rate due to placental abruption (PA) in Norway decreased from 3.2 to 1.7 per 1000. The proportion of all perinatal deaths due to PA increased from 11.4% in 1967-1971 to 217.0 in 1987-91 and decreased in all gestational age categories. Case fatality in PA with cesarean section (CS) was generally lower than in PA without CS, regardless of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Placental abruption is an important cause of perinatal mortality in Norway. Our results are in favor of an active approach with frequent use of cesarean section, also at lower gestational ages. The decreasing case fatality rate by year of birth in all gestational age groups may be attributed to improved obstetric and perinatal care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00016349609047092

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 66

Authors
Rasmussen, S., Irgens, L. M., Bergsjø, P., & Dalaker, K.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Svein
Venue
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
229-234
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2116828219
Cited by
66
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
placental abruption, perinatal mortality, case fatality, cesarean section, secular trends, stillbirth, early neonatal death, gestational age, obstetric care, Norway
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Death, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Norway, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Registries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review