Perinatal mortality and case fatality after placental abruption in Norway 1967-1991
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study national secular trends in Norway of perinatal mortality and case fatality to placental abruption (PA) and associations with cesarean section (CS). DESIGN: A population based cohort study. SETTING: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. PATIENTS: 9,592 cases of placental abruption (PA) of a total of 1,446,154 births notified in Norway 1967-1991. MAIN MEASURES: Comprehensive perinatal mortality (all stillbirths > or = 16 weeks of gestation and early neonatal deaths) and standard perinatal mortality (all stillbirths > or = 28 weeks of gestation and all early neonatal deaths). Case fatality rate. MAIN RESULTS: From 1967 through 1991, the standard perinatal mortality rate due to placental abruption (PA) in Norway decreased from 2.5 per 1000 births (13.5% of all deaths) in 1967 to 0.9 (13.2%) in 1991. The comprehensive perinatal mortality rate due to placental abruption (PA) in Norway decreased from 3.2 to 1.7 per 1000. The proportion of all perinatal deaths due to PA increased from 11.4% in 1967-1971 to 217.0 in 1987-91 and decreased in all gestational age categories. Case fatality in PA with cesarean section (CS) was generally lower than in PA without CS, regardless of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Placental abruption is an important cause of perinatal mortality in Norway. Our results are in favor of an active approach with frequent use of cesarean section, also at lower gestational ages. The decreasing case fatality rate by year of birth in all gestational age groups may be attributed to improved obstetric and perinatal care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abruption complicates 0.6-1.2% of pregnancies.
“Abruption occurs in 0.6–1.2% of all pregnancies, with nearly half of abruption occurring at term gestations.”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Approximately half of abruption occurs at term gestations.
“with nearly half of abruption occurring at term gestations.”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Rasmussen, S., Irgens, L. M., Bergsjø, P., & Dalaker, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Rasmussen, Svein
- ORCID
- Rasmussen, Svein
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-234
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2116828219
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- placental abruption, perinatal mortality, case fatality, cesarean section, secular trends, stillbirth, early neonatal death, gestational age, obstetric care, Norway
- MeSH terms
- Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Death, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Norway, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Registries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review