The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A population study of urinary incontinence and nocturia among women aged 20‐59 years
Open accessAbstract
Background. The aim was to study urinary incontinence (UI) and nocturia in a female population: prevalence, effect on well‐being, wish for treatment and result of treatment in primary health care. Methods. A postal questionnaire was sent to all women aged 20‐59 years who were scheduled for gynecological health examination by midwives in a primary health care district during one year. Questions concerning well‐being were based on the Gothenburg QOL instrument. All women with incontinence were offered treatment by a midwife and a family doctor. Results. Of the included 641 women. 491 (77%) answered the questionnaire. The prevalence of urinary incontinence was 27.7%, 3.5% having daily leakage. Nocturia occurred in 32 women (6.5%). 12 of whom were also incontinent. Self‐assessed health, sleep, fitness and satisfaction with work situation decreased significantly with increased frequency of incontinence. Well‐being was not correlated to type of incontinence. Nocturia correlated to poor health and sleep. About a quarter of the incontinent women started treatment when offered and 80% of those who completed the treatment program were subjectively improved. Wish for treatment was directly correlated to frequency of incontinence but not to type. Conclusions. Urinary incontinence and nocturia affect well‐being in a negative way. Well‐being and wish for treatment correlate to frequency of incontinence but not to type of incontinence. Most women with UI accept it; only about a quarter of incontinent women, or 6‐7% of all women in the studied age group, want treatment. Treatment of female urinary incontinence in primary health care is successful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross-sectional study of nocturia in both sexes: analysis of a voluntary health screening project
Schatzl, G., Temml, C., Schmidbauer, J., Dolezal, B., Haidinger, G., & Madersbacher, S. (2000) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00603-8 · Cited by 153
Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey.
Lukacz, E. S., Lawrence, J. M., Buckwalter, J. G., Burchette, R. J., Nager, C. W., & Luber, K. M. (2005) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-005-1314-5 · Cited by 131
Risk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause
(2000) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00285-2 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Samuelsson, E., Victor, A., & Tibblin, G.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-80
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2062919742
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A population study of urinary incontinence and nocturia among women aged 20‐59 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00016349709047789
- The paper
- Samuelsson, E., Victor, A., & Tibblin, G. (1997). A population study of urinary incontinence and nocturia among women aged 20‐59 years. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349709047789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.