The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ewald's Second Law Re-Evaluated
Abstract
Patients and experimental animals (cats) with one functioning horizontal semicircular canal were tested with precise rotatory stimuli. Nystagmus responses were quantified with EOG and a laboratory digital computer. After large-magnitude stimuli there was a statistically significant difference between the maximum slow component velocity of nystagmus induced by ampullopetal endolymph flow and that induced by ampullofugal endolymph flow in all patients and cats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of recovery following unilateral labyrinthectomy: a review
Smith, P. F., & Curthoys, I. S. (1989) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(89)90013-1 · Cited by 608
Head-shaking nystagmus in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions
Hain, T. C., Fetter, M., & Zee, D. S. (1987) · American Journal of Otolaryngology · doi:10.1016/s0196-0709(87)80017-0 · Cited by 340
Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1992) · The Head-Neck Sensory Motor System · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195068207.003.0033 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Baloh, R. W., Honrubia, V., & Konrad, H. R.
- Venue
- Acta Oto-Laryngologica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1-6
- Pages
- 475-479
- ISSN
- 0001-6489 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2251
- OpenAlex
- W1985753182
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ewald's Second Law Re-Evaluated. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00016487709128874
- The paper
- Baloh, R. W., Honrubia, V., & Konrad, H. R. (1977). Ewald's Second Law Re-Evaluated. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487709128874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
