Stigmatizing Attitudes towards People with Mental Disorders: Findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma
Abstract
Objective: This paper reports findings from a national survey on stigmatizing attitudes towards people with depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis. Method: In 2011 telephone interviews were carried out with 6019 Australians aged 15 or over. Participants were presented with a case vignette describing either depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia or post-traumatic stress disorder. Questions were asked about stigmatizing attitudes, including perceptions of discrimination, personal and perceived stigma and desire for social distance. Results: Chronic schizophrenia was most likely to be associated with dangerousness, unpredictability and a preference for not employing someone with the problem, while social phobia was most likely to be seen as due to personal weakness. Attitudes concerning dangerousness and social distance were greater in relation to men with mental disorders compared to women. Other people were perceived as more likely to hold stigmatizing attitudes than the respondents reported for themselves. Conclusions: Anti-stigma interventions are more likely to be successful if they focus on individual disorders rather than on ‘mental illness’ in general. Such interventions may need to address perceptions of social phobia as being due to weakness and those of dangerousness in people with more severe disorders. Such interventions should also focus on bringing beliefs about public perceptions in line with personal beliefs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been some improvements in community understanding of common mental illnesses, particularly depression and anxiety.
“While there have been some improvements in community understanding of common mental illnesses (particularly depression and anxiety), there is still widespread misunderstanding and ignorance [2, 3].”
From Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works? (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
There is still widespread misunderstanding and ignorance about common mental illnesses.
“While there have been some improvements in community understanding of common mental illnesses (particularly depression and anxiety), there is still widespread misunderstanding and ignorance [2, 3].”
From Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works? (2021) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 298
- Authors
- Reavley, N. J., & Jorm, A. F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Reavley, Nicola J.
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1086-1093
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W1987112575
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- mental health stigma, stigmatizing attitudes, mental health literacy, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, perceived stigma, personal stigma, social distance, perceived dangerousness, gender differences, stigma reduction interventions, public perception of mental illness, case vignettes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Psychological Distance, Stereotyping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review