Cited by 298Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Stigmatizing Attitudes towards People with Mental Disorders: Findings from an Australian National Survey of Mental Health Literacy and Stigma

Reavley, Nicola J., Jorm, Anthony F.·2011·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: This paper reports findings from a national survey on stigmatizing attitudes towards people with depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/psychosis. Method: In 2011 telephone interviews were carried out with 6019 Australians aged 15 or over. Participants were presented with a case vignette describing either depression, depression with suicidal thoughts, early schizophrenia, chronic schizophrenia, social phobia or post-traumatic stress disorder. Questions were asked about stigmatizing attitudes, including perceptions of discrimination, personal and perceived stigma and desire for social distance. Results: Chronic schizophrenia was most likely to be associated with dangerousness, unpredictability and a preference for not employing someone with the problem, while social phobia was most likely to be seen as due to personal weakness. Attitudes concerning dangerousness and social distance were greater in relation to men with mental disorders compared to women. Other people were perceived as more likely to hold stigmatizing attitudes than the respondents reported for themselves. Conclusions: Anti-stigma interventions are more likely to be successful if they focus on individual disorders rather than on ‘mental illness’ in general. Such interventions may need to address perceptions of social phobia as being due to weakness and those of dangerousness in people with more severe disorders. Such interventions should also focus on bringing beliefs about public perceptions in line with personal beliefs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00048674.2011.621061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 298

Authors
Reavley, N. J., & Jorm, A. F.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Reavley, Nicola J.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
1086-1093
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W1987112575
Cited by
298
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
mental health stigma, stigmatizing attitudes, mental health literacy, depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, perceived stigma, personal stigma, social distance, perceived dangerousness, gender differences, stigma reduction interventions, public perception of mental illness, case vignettes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Psychological Distance, Stereotyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review