Cited by 105Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Dissociative Identity Disorder: An Australian Series

Middleton, Warwick, Butler, Jeremy·1998·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Series of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), otherwise known as multiple personality disorder, have particularly been reported on in North America and increasingly in other countries. The present study investigated the trauma and past treatment histories, symptom profiles and dissociative phenomenology of 62 patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for DID seen in Brisbane (Queensland, Australia). Method: From 1992, systematic assessments, including the Dissociative Experience Scale and the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule, were performed with a personal series of 57 patients with DID seen by one of the authors (WM) and five patients seen by the second author (JB). Results: The histories of childhood trauma, the clinical profiles and dissociative indices of these patients closely approximate those described in series reported in other countries. Conclusions: Patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for DID are regularly seen in Australian inpatient and outpatient settings. The dissociative symptomatology of the patients examined in the present study represents a significant component of a complex syndrome associated with a history of severe ongoing developmental trauma dating from early childhood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00048679809073868

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 105

Authors
Middleton, W., & Butler, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Belmont Hospital (AU)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1998-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
794-804
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2142325878
Cited by
105
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
dissociative identity disorder, childhood trauma, symptom profiles, treatment history, Dissociative Experiences Scale, Australian patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Australia, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Incest, Male, Middle Aged, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Terminology as Topic, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Somatoform Disorders, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review