Exposure to Nicotine Produces an Increase in Dopamine D2HighReceptors: A Possible Mechanism for Dopamine Hypersensitivity
Abstract
Dopamine D2 receptors exist in both low- and high-affinity states (D2(High)), the latter being the functionally relevant state. Cocaine self-administration produces an increase in D2(High), a phenomenon that could explain why cocaine administration results in hypersensitivity to dopamine, even though drug addicts were found to have a decreased number of striatal dopamine D2 receptors. As nicotine acts through the same mesocortical dopaminergic signaling pathways as other stimulant drugs, which are known to increase the levels of D2(High), we hypothesized that nicotine exposure could produce an increase in D2(High) levels. We determined D2(High) levels in rats after nicotine administration (1.5 mg/kg/day; 14 days), in rats voluntarily self-administering nicotine using an intravenous self-administration (IVSA) protocol (mean dose 0.5 mg/kg/day; 14 days), as well as after a prolonged withdrawal. An increase in the levels of D2(High) was found in rats who had nicotine administered at a uniform dose, as well as in rats who self-administered nicotine via IVSA, but these changes appear to normalize over time, as indicated by lower D2(High) levels in rats after a prolonged withdrawal period. We suggest that nicotine-induced elevation in D2(High) levels could be participating in hypersensitivity to dopamine following nicotine exposure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repeated nicotine exposure produces heterologous adaptations, including increased AMPA/NMDA current ratios at DA neurons and increased high-affinity D2 receptors in the NAcc.
“Besides altering cholinergic function, repeated nicotine exposure produces heterologous adaptations. For example, nicotine increases AMPA/NMDA current ratios (a hallmark of long-term potentiation) at DA neurons [94–96] and other locations involved in drug-associated memory [97–99]. In the NAcc, nicotine leads to an increase in high affinity DA D2 receptors [100].”
From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Novak, G., Seeman, P., & Foll, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Foll, Bernard Le
- Venue
- International Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 691-697
- ISSN
- 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-5245
- OpenAlex
- W20942582
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- 美学
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- nicotine, dopamine D2 receptor, nicotine self-administration, nicotine withdrawal, striatal dopamine receptors
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Domperidone, Dopamine, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Self Administration, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tritium, Up-Regulation, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review