Cited by 108Visual perception and processing mechanismsPsychological Testing and AssessmentAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visuoperceptual Processes in Brain Damaged Patients on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test

Glosser, Guila, Butters, Nelson, Kaplan, Edith·1977·International Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Alcoholic Korsakoff patients, patients with right hemisphere damage, and chronic alcoholics are impaired on the digit symbol substitution task (DSST) of the WAIS. To determine whether these deficits were related to psychomotor or visuoperceptive factors, several tasks and modifications of the DSST were administered to these three patient populations. While it was evident that psychomotor retardation contributed to the patients' poor performance, impairments in visuoperceptive processing were also found to be involved in the DSST performance of the three patient groups. It was concluded that while a psychomotor factor is the crucial variable in the performance of intact normal subjects, any of a number of visual processing variables (e.g., visual scanning, contour formation and organization) must be considered in assessing the deficits of brain damaged patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00207457709147202

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Talland G. A, 1965, Deranged Memory
  2. Witkin H. A., 1971, A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 108

Metadata

Authors
Glosser, G., Butters, N., & Kaplan, E.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
International Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1977-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
59-66
ISSN
  • 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5245
OpenAlex
W2010506027
Cited by
108
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Keywords
Digit Symbol Substitution Test, visuoperception, psychomotor retardation, Korsakoff syndrome, alcoholic brain damage, right hemisphere damage, chronic alcoholism, visual exploration, visual processing deficits, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Alcohol Amnestic Disorder, Brain Damage, Chronic, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paired-Associate Learning, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Visual Perception, Wechsler Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review