Cited by 252Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory InteractionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

From the heart to the brain: A study of heartbeat contingent scalp potentials

Schandry, R., Sparrer, B., Weitkunat, R.·1986·International Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Heartbeat perception has become the most widely studied example of visceral perception. In the present study scalp potentials contingent to the visceral event "heartbeat" were investigated. Scalp potentials, averaged time-locked to the EKG-R-wave, were studied at Fz, Cz, and Pz under four conditions: resting (baseline), heartbeat discrimination task, signal detection task, and heartbeat discrimination task after physical exercise. 22 subjects were assigned to the two groups "good" and "poor" perceivers, according to their performance in an initial heartbeat perception test. Event related potentials (ERPs) of "good" perceivers were more stable across conditions than those of "poor" perceivers. Peak latency within the range of 200 to 300 ms differed significantly between conditions. A principal component analysis performed on the ERP averages extracted five components. Subsequent ANOVAs across factor scores yielded significant main effects for the "groups" factor, experimental conditions and electrode sites. The strongest effects occurred over the frontal region in the latency range of 250-400 ms (following the EKG-R-wave). These were found to be not due to artifactual EKG influences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00207458608985677

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs.

    “Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs 92-98 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [92]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 252

Authors
Schandry, R., Sparrer, B., & Weitkunat, R.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
International Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1986-01
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
261-275
ISSN
  • 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5245
OpenAlex
W2149859795
Cited by
252
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
heartbeat perception, visceral sensation, event-related potentials, scalp potentials, physical activity, ERP latency, frontal cortex, interoception
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Discrimination, Psychological, Electrocardiography, Evoked Potentials, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Perception, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review