The neurophysiological bases of high IQ
Abstract
It is suggested that the study of human intelligence must ultimately involve the study of brain processes which limit the availability of information. Consideration of EEG/intelligence studies suggests that inconsistent findings may have arisen partly from the expectation of simple rectilinear relationships where relationships are likely to be curvilinear. There are also theoretical and technical problems such that it is difficult to specify what conventional EEG procedures measure. The EEG evoked potential (EP) data described in this paper were obtained with a new and more powerful analytical procedure based on methods and concepts of systems analysis. With this procedure, EP responses are used to ascertain the relative values of parameters which quantify differences in the transmission characteristics of thalamocortical neuron populations. The results obtained from a study of 48 subjects indicate that high IQ is associated with combinations of neurological parameters which determine an intermediate degree of "arousability" in the cerebral cortex and related structures. This relationship is accounted for in terms of the generally optimal effect that an intermediate degree of arousability would have on different neurophysiological processes mediating the acquisition, retention and utilization of information. Thus, with some important qualifications, middling arousability can be conceived as the neurophysiological basis of high general intelligence or "g".
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robinson (1989) suggested that a curvilinear relationship as described by the Yerkes-Dodson law between EEG characteristics and WAIS scores may better explain the data.
“To account for the contradictory findings, Robinson (1989) suggested that a curvilinear relationship as described by the Yerkes-Dodson law between EEG characteristics and WAIS scores may better explain the data.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Robinson (1989)
To account for inconsistent findings, Robinson (1989) later proposed that ambiverts, due to their optimum level of arousal, performed better on the WAIS than either extraverts or introverts.
“To account for the inconsistent findings (Rawlings & Carnie, 1989; Rawlings & Skok, 1993; Saklofske & Kostura, 1990), Robinson (1989) later proposed that ambiverts (intermediate level of extraversion), due to their optimum level of arousal, performed better on the WAIS than either extraverts or introverts.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Robinson (1989)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Robinson, D. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, David L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 209-234
- ISSN
- 0020-7454 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-5245
- OpenAlex
- W2114275593
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- high IQ, general intelligence, thalamocortical transmission, information availability, curvilinear relationship, systems analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Wechsler Scales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review