The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diurnal pattern of insulin requirements in insulin-dependent diabetics
Abstract
A total of 35 experiments in which insulin-dependent diabetics were connected to an artificial beta cell (Biostator) for feedback control of blood glucose during at least 24 h, were evaluated. Only 14 experiments, however, were available for analysis, since interruptions of more than 45 min/24 h in feedback control due to clots in analyser tubing occurred in those remaining. In these 14 experiments the 24-h insulin-infusion pattern was analysed. Basal insulin requirements (BIR), (between 01.00 and 04.00 hours) was found to be 0.178 +/- 0.044 (SD) mU/kg X min. Insulin requirements increased in the early morning (04.00-07.00 hours) to 0.231 +/- 0.084 mU/kg X min (P less than 0.01). A significant correlation between BIR and 24-h insulin requirement was found (r = 0.53, P less than 0.05). Insulin requirements per kJ following breakfast were higher than after lunch, 0.57 +/- 0.20 muU/kg X min X kJ versus 0.41 +/- 0.29 muU/kg X min X kJ (P less than 0.05).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although some (20,24,27) but not all (21–23,26) studies that used the Biostator controlled for physical activity levels, meal sizes, composition, and calorie content varied from meal to meal in all but one (27).”
From Diurnal Pattern of Insulin Action in Type 1 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“With use of the Biostator, Mathiesen et al. (20) demonstrated that insulin requirements per kilojoule consumed was higher at breakfast than at lunch, thereby implying a lower insulin action at breakfast than at lunch”
From Diurnal Pattern of Insulin Action in Type 1 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Although the diurnal pattern of SI in type 1 diabetic subjects in the present study concords to the albeit indirect observations of Mathiesen et al. (20), important differences in study designs must be noted”
From Diurnal Pattern of Insulin Action in Type 1 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Diurnal Pattern of Insulin Action in Type 1 Diabetes
Hinshaw, L., Dalla Man, C., Nandy, D. K., Saad, A., Bharucha, A. E., Levine, J. A., Rizza, R. A., Basu, R., Carter, R. E., Cobelli, C., et al. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-1759 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathiesen, E. R., Rubin, P., Christiansen, J. S., Svendsen, P. A., Lauritzen, T., & Deckert, T.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-68
- ISSN
- 0036-5513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252041577
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- insulin requirement, diurnal variation, type 1 diabetes, insulin dose
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Circadian Rhythm, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Equipment Design, Feedback, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
