The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn's disease
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Reasons for infliximab failure in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are debated. Serum levels of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies have been associated with loss of response. We aimed at determining cut-off levels for infliximab and anti-infliximab antibody concentrations associated with clinical response to infliximab maintenance therapy. METHODS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (n = 106) were retrospectively classified as having maintained response or loss of response to infliximab maintenance therapy. Trough concentrations were measured by fluid-phase radioimmunoassays. RESULTS: Infliximab levels were significantly lower, and anti-infliximab antibody levels significantly higher, in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response (median infliximab 0 μg/ml, median anti-infliximab antibodies 35 U/ml) compared to patients with maintained response (median infliximab 2.8 μg/ml, median anti-infliximab antibodies 0 U/ml; p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal cut-off values: infliximab <0.5 μg/ml, which was associated with loss of response with sensitivity 86% [64-97] and specificity 85% [72-94]; and anti-infliximab antibodies ≥10 U/ml yielding a sensitivity of 81% [61-93] and specificity 90% [79-96]. Combined measurements of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies using these cut-off values had higher accuracy yielding a sensitivity of 81% [57-94] and specificity 94% [82-98]. Similar pattern was observed in a smaller cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Combined measurements of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies using cut-off levels provided high accuracy for discriminating between clinical response types to infliximab maintenance therapy. Cut-off levels are considered a prerequisite to further investigations of clinical usefulness of measurements of infliximab and anti-infliximab antibodies in patients failing infliximab therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Svenson, M., Geborek, P., Saxne, T., & Bendtzen, K. (2007) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem261 · Cited by 189
Self-citation
Cited by
Shankar, G., Arkin, S., Cocea, L., Devanarayan, V., Kirshner, S., Kromminga, A., Quarmby, V., Richards, S., Schneider, C. K., Subramanyam, M., et al. (2014) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9599-2 · Cited by 353
Mitrev, N., Vande Casteele, N., Seow, C. H., Andrews, J. M., Connor, S. J., Moore, G. T., Barclay, M., Begun, J., Bryant, R., Chan, W., et al. (2017) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.14368 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Steenholdt, C., Bendtzen, K., Brynskov, J., Thomsen, O. Ø., & Ainsworth, M. A.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11-18
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 310-318
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W2043261411
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00365521.2010.536254
- The paper
- Steenholdt, C., Bendtzen, K., Brynskov, J., Thomsen, O. Ø., & Ainsworth, M. A. (2011). Cut-off levels and diagnostic accuracy of infliximab trough levels and anti-infliximab antibodies in Crohn's disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2010.536254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.