The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Well-Being and Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Patients Referred to Endoscopy Owing to Suspected Duodenal Ulcer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated quality of of life (QoL) in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases, and there is a lack of validated measures for use in gastroenterology. METHODS: The applicability and relevance of self-administered questionnaires such as the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptoms referred to endoscopy because of suspected duodenal ulcer were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 1526 patients with suspected duodenal ulcer were screened for inclusion in a clinical study. On the basis of medical history and endoscopy, 1424 patients who completed the questionnaire before endoscopy were classified in five diagnostic groups: oesophagitis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, negative endoscopy, and gastritis duodenitis. Irrespective of diagnosis, all patient groups reported a considerable decrease in their general well-being (mean score, 85, compared with 105 in healthy populations) with no significant differences between the groups. The results of the GSRS, however, showed statistically significant differences between the groups in dimensions depicting Abdominal pain, Reflux, Indigestion, and Diarrhoea Syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that, irrespective of endoscopic findings, patients complaining of upper gastrointestinal symptoms have a low degree of general well-being. The symptoms profiles in the different diagnostic groups vary considerably.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life
Gralnek, I. M., Hays, R. D., Kilbourne, A., Naliboff, B., & Mayer, E. A. (2000) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2000.16484 · Cited by 781
Dunlop, S. P., Jenkins, D., Neal, K. R., & Spiller, R. C. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.09.028 · Cited by 583
Design of Treatment Trials for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Irvine, E. J., Tack, J., Crowell, M. D., Gwee, K. A., Ke, M., Schmulson, M. J., Whitehead, W. E., & Spiegel, B. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.010 · Cited by 550
Abnormal Intestinal Permeability in Subgroups of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndromes
Dunlop, S. P., Hebden, J., Campbell, E., Naesdal, J., Olbe, L., Perkins, A. C., & Spiller, R. C. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00672.x · Cited by 476
The Impact of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Health-related Quality of Life
Revicki, D. A., Wood, M., Maton, P. N., & Sorensen, S. (1998) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00354-9 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimenäs, E., Glise, H., Hallerbäck, B., Hernqvist, H., Svedlund, J., & Wiklund, I.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1046-1052
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W2020809105
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Well-Being and Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Patients Referred to Endoscopy Owing to Suspected Duodenal Ulcer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00365529509101605
- The paper
- Dimenäs, E., Glise, H., Hallerbäck, B., Hernqvist, H., Svedlund, J., & Wiklund, I. (1995). Well-Being and Gastrointestinal Symptoms among Patients Referred to Endoscopy Owing to Suspected Duodenal Ulcer. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529509101605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.