Profiles of Distress Intolerance in a Substance-Dependent Sample
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distress intolerance (DI) - the perceived inability to tolerate distressing states - is an important variable in substance abuse, with links to coping motives and return to use following a quit attempt. Recent research suggests that DI is a heterogeneous construct that varies based on the domain of distress (e.g., pain, anxiety). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether elevations in DI in substance-dependent (SD) patients varied based on the domain of distress. METHODS: Individuals (N = 55) with a diagnosis of illicit drug dependence and an affective disorder equated comparison (CO) group were administered three measures of DI - assessing pain, frustration, and respiratory discomfort. RESULTS: The SD group demonstrated significantly greater frustration intolerance, but not greater pain intolerance or respiratory discomfort intolerance relative to the CO group. CONCLUSION: When controlling for the presence of an affective disorder, SD patients exhibited elevated frustration intolerance, suggesting that this may be a particularly difficult type of distress for this group. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: DI is linked to important clinical outcomes and can be modified with treatment. Identification of intolerance of specific domains of distress associated with select disorders may help to better target such interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies of non-cancer pain have identified psychiatric symptoms and coping skills deficits as risks for medication misuse and opioid use disorder.
“This is consistent with studies of non-cancer pain that have identified psychiatric symptoms and coping skills deficits as risks for medication misuse and opioid use disorder.810”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Kathryn McHugh, R., & Otto, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University (US)
- ORCID
- Otto, Michael W.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12-21
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-165
- ISSN
- 0095-2990 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-9891
- OpenAlex
- W2040579780
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Psychological Association
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017904)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- distress intolerance, substance dependence, frustration intolerance, mood disorders, illicit drug dependence, coping motives, return to use
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review