Cited by 44Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Profiles of Distress Intolerance in a Substance-Dependent Sample

Kathryn McHugh, R., Otto, Michael W.·2012·The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distress intolerance (DI) - the perceived inability to tolerate distressing states - is an important variable in substance abuse, with links to coping motives and return to use following a quit attempt. Recent research suggests that DI is a heterogeneous construct that varies based on the domain of distress (e.g., pain, anxiety). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether elevations in DI in substance-dependent (SD) patients varied based on the domain of distress. METHODS: Individuals (N = 55) with a diagnosis of illicit drug dependence and an affective disorder equated comparison (CO) group were administered three measures of DI - assessing pain, frustration, and respiratory discomfort. RESULTS: The SD group demonstrated significantly greater frustration intolerance, but not greater pain intolerance or respiratory discomfort intolerance relative to the CO group. CONCLUSION: When controlling for the presence of an affective disorder, SD patients exhibited elevated frustration intolerance, suggesting that this may be a particularly difficult type of distress for this group. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: DI is linked to important clinical outcomes and can be modified with treatment. Identification of intolerance of specific domains of distress associated with select disorders may help to better target such interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00952990.2011.643990

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 44

Authors
Kathryn McHugh, R., & Otto, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Published
2011-12-21
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
161-165
ISSN
  • 0095-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-9891
OpenAlex
W2040579780
Cited by
44
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017904)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
distress intolerance, substance dependence, frustration intolerance, mood disorders, illicit drug dependence, coping motives, return to use
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review