CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNoise Effects and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loudness Discomfort Level and Reliability as a Function of Instructional Set

Bornstein, Steven P., Musick, Frank E.·1993·Scandinavian Audiology
DOI 10.3109/01050399309046028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) for a 12-speaker babble were measured in 20 subjects with normal hearing sensitivity for two instructional sets, listening in the sound field. One instructional set asked the listener to indicate when they would choose 'not to listen for any period of time'. The second instructional set asked the listeners to indicate when they 'would choose not to listen for 15 minutes or longer'. A simple up-down adaptive procedure was used to measure LDLs. Data were gathered on both instructional sets for all listeners. LDLs for each instructional set were repeated on four separate occasions within a range of 1-3 weeks. The average LDLs for the instructions utilizing the criterion of choosing not to listen for any period of time were 9 dB higher than the criterion of choosing not to listen for 15 minutes or longer. The reliability of LDLs for both instructional sets was high, ranging from correlations of 0.90-0.97 for the criterion of choosing not to listen for any period of time, and ranging from correlations of 0.62-0.89 for the criterion of listening for 15 minutes or longer. The criterion of choosing not to listen for any period of time resulted in slightly more reliable measures. These results support the importance of considering the instructions given to a person to measure LDLs, and hence for where to set the saturation sound pressure level of a hearing aid. Also, with appropriate methods, LDLs can be reliably measured in the sound field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01050399309046028

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American National Standards Institute, 1977, Standard criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing
  2. American National Standards Institute, 1969, Specifications for audiometers
  3. Berger K, 1976, Maico Audiological Library Series, 15
  4. Berger K, 1982, Hear Instr, 33, 16
  5. Berger K, 1984, Prescription of hearing aids: rationale, procedures and results. 4th ed
  6. Cox R M, 1981, Hear Instr, 32, 16
  7. Cox R M, 1989, J Speech Hcar Res, 32, 16
  8. Hawkins D, 1980, Ear Hear, 45, 3
  9. Humes L, 1990, J Am Acad Audiol, 1, 101
  10. Ross M, 1988, Hearing impairment in children, 190
  11. Skinner M W, 1980, Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bornstein, S. P., & Musick, F. E.
Affiliations
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
Venue
Scandinavian Audiology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1993-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
125-131
ISSN
0105-0397 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3109/01050399309046028
OpenAlex
W2120335096
Cited by
29
References
35
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Connecticut
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
loudness discomfort level, reliability statistics, instructional set, babble, sound field measurement, normal-hearing listeners
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Hearing, Humans, Loudness Perception, Male, Noise, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review