Patients as educators: interprofessional learning for patient-centred care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic conditions have unique expertise that enhances interprofessional education. Although their active involvement in education is increasing, patients have minimal roles in key educational tasks. A model that brings patients and students together for patient-centred learning, with faculty playing a supportive role, has been described in theory but not yet implemented. AIMS: To identify issues involved in creating an educational intervention designed and delivered by patients and document outcomes. METHOD: An advisory group of community members, students and faculty guided development of the intervention (interprofessional workshops). Community educators (CEs) were recruited through community organizations with a healthcare mandate. Workshops were planned by teams of key stakeholders, delivered by CEs, and evaluated by post-workshop student questionnaires. RESULTS: Workshops were delivered by CEs with epilepsy, arthritis, HIV/AIDS and two groups with mental health problems. Roles and responsibilities of planning team members that facilitated control by CEs were identified. Ten workshops attended by 142 students from 15 different disciplines were all highly rated. Workshop objectives defined by CEs and student learning both closely matched dimensions of patient-centredness. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates feasibility and impact of an educational intervention led by patient educators facilitated but not controlled by faculty.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
They highlight the critical role of the community organisation representatives who can be brokers between the two cultures of academia and community.
“They highlight the critical role of the community organisation representatives who can be brokers between the two cultures of academia and community.”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Towle et al discussed the tension between preparedness of patient educators and authenticity of education in both form and content.
“Towle et al discussed the tension between preparedness of patient educators and authenticity of education in both form and content.49”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Several patients were members of the steering committee for the psychiatry curriculum and the interprofessional education curriculum.
“Several patients were members of the steering committee for the psychiatry curriculum28 and the interprofessional education curriculum.49”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
The faculty member's role was to support the direct learning between students and mentors.
“The faculty member’s role was to support the direct learning between students and mentors.49”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Representatives of community-based patient advocacy and support organisations took part in the advisory group of the intervention in the study by Towle and Godolphin.
“Representatives of community-based patient advocacy and support organisations took part in the advisory group of the intervention in the study by Towle and Godolphin.49”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Towle, A., & Godolphin, W.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Towle, Angela
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-225
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2116086294
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- patient educators, interprofessional education, patient-centered care, chronic disease, community educators, stakeholder engagement, student perceptions, epilepsy, arthritis, HIV/AIDS, mental health
- MeSH terms
- British Columbia, Chronic Disease, Education, Medical, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Program Development, Focus Groups, Patient-Centered Care, Advisory Committees, Interdisciplinary Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review