Cited by 99Innovations in Medical EducationInterprofessional Education and CollaborationMental Health and Patient Involvement

Patients as educators: interprofessional learning for patient-centred care

Towle, Angela, Godolphin, William·2013·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic conditions have unique expertise that enhances interprofessional education. Although their active involvement in education is increasing, patients have minimal roles in key educational tasks. A model that brings patients and students together for patient-centred learning, with faculty playing a supportive role, has been described in theory but not yet implemented. AIMS: To identify issues involved in creating an educational intervention designed and delivered by patients and document outcomes. METHOD: An advisory group of community members, students and faculty guided development of the intervention (interprofessional workshops). Community educators (CEs) were recruited through community organizations with a healthcare mandate. Workshops were planned by teams of key stakeholders, delivered by CEs, and evaluated by post-workshop student questionnaires. RESULTS: Workshops were delivered by CEs with epilepsy, arthritis, HIV/AIDS and two groups with mental health problems. Roles and responsibilities of planning team members that facilitated control by CEs were identified. Ten workshops attended by 142 students from 15 different disciplines were all highly rated. Workshop objectives defined by CEs and student learning both closely matched dimensions of patient-centredness. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates feasibility and impact of an educational intervention led by patient educators facilitated but not controlled by faculty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.737966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 99

Authors
Towle, A., & Godolphin, W.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Towle, Angela
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
219-225
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2116086294
Cited by
99
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
patient educators, interprofessional education, patient-centered care, chronic disease, community educators, stakeholder engagement, student perceptions, epilepsy, arthritis, HIV/AIDS, mental health
MeSH terms
British Columbia, Chronic Disease, Education, Medical, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Program Development, Focus Groups, Patient-Centered Care, Advisory Committees, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review