Cited by 19Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

The multiple mini-interview for selecting medical residents: first experience in the Middle East region

Ahmed, Ashraf, Qayed, Khalil Ibrahim, Abdulrahman, Mahera, Tavares, Walter, Rosenfeld, Jack·2014·Medical Teacher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have shown that multiple mini-interviews (MMI) provides a standard, fair, and more reliable method for assessing applicants. This article presents the first MMI experience for selection of medical residents in the Middle East culture and an Arab country. METHODS: In 2012, we started using the MMI in interviewing applicants to the residency program of Dubai Health Authority. This interview process consisted of eight, eight-minute structured interview scenarios. Applicants rotated through the stations, each with its own interviewer and scenario. They read the scenario and were requested to discuss the issues with the interviewers. Sociodemographic and station assessment data provided for each applicant were analyzed to determine whether the MMI was a reliable assessment of the non-clinical attributes in the present setting of an Arab country. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven candidates from 27 different countries were interviewed for Dubai Residency Training Program using MMI. They were graduates of 5 medical universities within United Arab Emirates (UAE) and 60 different universities outside UAE. With this applicant's pool, a MMI with eight stations, produced absolute and relative reliability of 0.8 and 0.81, respectively. The person × station interaction contributed 63% of the variance components, the person contributed 34% of the variance components, and the station contributed 2% of the variance components. DISCUSSION: The MMI has been used in numerous universities in English speaking countries. The MMI evaluates non-clinical attributes and this study provides further evidence for its reliability but in a different country and culture. The MMI offers a fair and more reliable assessment of applicants to medical residency programs. The present data show that this assessment technique applied in a non-western country and Arab culture still produced reliable results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2014.907875

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 19

Authors
Ahmed, A., Qayed, K. I., Abdulrahman, M., Tavares, W., & Rosenfeld, J.
Affiliations
  • Dubai Health Authority (AE)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Ashraf
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2014-05-07
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
703-709
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2098922794
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
multiple mini-interviews, residency selection, residency recruitment, interview reliability, Arab culture, Middle East, variance components, international medical graduates
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Female, Foreign Medical Graduates, Humans, Internship and Residency, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle East, Personnel Selection, Prospective Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review