Cited by 9Reproductive Health and ContraceptionInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Knowledge and perception of the Nigerian Abortion Law by abortion seekers in south-eastern Nigeria

Adinma, E. D., Adinma, J. I. B., Ugboaja, J., Iwuoha, C., Akiode, A., Oji, E., Okoh, M.·2011·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

One in four pregnancies worldwide is voluntarily terminated. Approximately 20 million terminations are performed under unsafe conditions, mostly in developing countries with restrictive abortion laws. A total of 100 consecutive abortion-seekers were interviewed, to ascertain their knowledge and perceptions on the Nigerian Abortion Law. The majority (55.0%) of the respondents were students. Most of them (97%) had at least secondary education and the majority (62.0%) were within the 20-24 years age range. Only 31.0% of the women interviewed were aware of the Nigerian Abortion Law. While 16% perceived the law as being restrictive, 2% opined that' it was alright'; 1% perceived it as very restrictive and 12% had no opinion on the abortion law. Knowledge of the abortion law had no significant relationship with either the educational level of the respondent or the number of previous pregnancy terminations and overall demand for abortion services. It is necessary to ensure a wide dissemination of the abortion law and its provisions to the Nigerian public, in order to arm them with the necessary information to participate actively in debates on abortion law reforms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01443615.2011.593645

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adinma, E. D., Adinma, J. I. B., Ugboaja, J., Iwuoha, C., Akiode, A., Oji, E., & Okoh, M.
Corresponding author
Adinma, E. D.
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Published
2011-11
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
763-766
ISSN
  • 0144-3615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6893
OpenAlex
W2133483367
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
abortion law, abortion seekers, restrictive abortion laws, abortion law reform, unsafe abortion, South-East Nigeria, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nigeria, Pregnancy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review