Cited by 340Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionLiver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Serum Enzymes as Indicators of Chemically Induced Liver Damage

Drotman, R. B., Lawhorn, G. T.·1978·Drug and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Rats were dosed with CCl4 or diethylamine to induce liver injury. The time and magnitude of peak liver injury were assessed by histopathological examination of liver specimens taken at intervals after dosing. Serum enzymes were measured at the same intervals. Serum ornithine carbamyl transferase (SOCT) activity increased at least 6-fold in animals that showed liver damage by histopathology, and fell again as the injuries resolved. Measurements of other enzymes were less sensitive. SOCT measurements appear to be as sensitive a method as histopathology for detecting liver damage caused by administering xenobiotics. Since serum enzyme measurements do not require that the animals be sacrificed, they can be used for repeated examinations of the same animals, thus increasing the likelihood of detecting transient injury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01480547809034433

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hepatic necrosis leads to elevated levels of serum enzymes AST and ALT which are indicative of cellular leakage and loss of functional integrity of cell membrane in the liver.

    “Hepatic necrosis leads to the elevated levels of serum enzymes AST and ALT which are indicative of cellular leakage and loss of functional integrity of cell membrane in the liver. 41”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1016/0015-6264(71)90236-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0041-008X(72)90255-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0041-008X(73)90265-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0015-6264(75)90155-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395630-9.50138-9 · DOI
  6. Freedland R. A., 1965, Res. Vet. Sci., 6, 18
  7. 10.3181/00379727-96-23439 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Drotman, R. B., & Lawhorn, G. T.
Affiliations
Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Venue
Drug and Chemical Toxicology
Published
1978-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
163-171
ISSN
  • 0148-0545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6014
OpenAlex
W2047165626
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 26
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
serum enzymes, liver injury, carbon tetrachloride, diethylamine, ornithine carbamyl transferase, histopathology comparison, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Tetrachloride Poisoning, Diethylamines, Enzymes, Liver, Male, Time Factors, Rats, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review