“Life on Hold”: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences with Outpatient Commitment in Two Norwegian Counties
Open accessAbstract
In recent decades, outpatient commitment orders have been increasingly used in the follow-up of persons with serious mental disorders. Most studies on outpatient commitment orders have focused on compliance and consumption of health care services; there is little research on the content of outpatient commitment orders from a patient perspective. The aim of this study is to examine patients' experiences of living with outpatient commitment orders, and is based on qualitative interviews with 16 persons in two Norwegian counties. The data were analysed using a constructivist, interpretive approach to the grounded theory method. The main finding was that patients with outpatient commitment orders felt that their lives were on hold. The feeling of being seen only as patients prevented them from taking responsibility for their own lives. The medical context was perceived as an obstacle to recovery and transition to a more normal life. Patients' daily lives were dominated by the agenda set by health care providers and many said they were subjected to control measures that resulted in a reduced quality of life. However, informants also spoke of positive experiences as outpatient commitment order patients, such as feeling safe and secure and having easy access to health care staff and services.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Stensrud, B., Høyer, G., Granerud, A., & Landheim, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Innlandet Hospital Trust (NO)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Hedmark University College (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Stensrud, Bjørn
- ORCID
- Landheim, Anne Signe
- Venue
- Issues in Mental Health Nursing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-03-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-216
- ISSN
- 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-4673
- PMC
- PMC4776696
- OpenAlex
- W1998580001
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam)
- Sykehuset Innlandet HF
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- outpatient commitment, severe mental illness, patient experience, patient perspectives, mental health law, recovery, quality of life, control measures, patient autonomy, health care access, Norway
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review