Safety of sapropterin dihydrochloride (6r–bh4) in patients with pulmonary hypertension
Abstract
The authors investigated the safety of oral tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor for nitric oxide synthesis, as a novel treatment for pulmonary hypertension (PH). Eighteen patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or inoperable chronic thromboembolic PH received sapropterin dihydrochloride (6R-BH4), the optically active form of BH4, in addition to treatment with sildenafil and/or endothelin receptor antagonists in an open-label, dose-escalation study. 6R-BH4 was administered starting at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg and increasing to 20 mg/kg over 8 weeks. Changes in markers of nitric oxide synthesis, inflammation and oxidant stress, as well as exercise capacity and cardiac function were measured. 6R-BH4 was well tolerated at all doses without systemic hypotension, even when given in combination with sildenafil. There was a small but significant reduction in plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 levels on 5 mg/kg. No significant changes in measures of nitric oxide synthesis or oxidant stress were observed. There was improvement in 6-minute walk distance, most significant at a dose of 5 mg/kg, from 379 ± 61 to 413 ± 57 m 414 ± 57 m (P = .002). Oral 6R-BH4 can be administered safely in doses up to 20 mg/kg daily to patients with PH. Further studies are needed to explore its therapeutic potential.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NO production is critical for vascular function.
“NO production is critical for vascular function as described in previous sections (299, 573, 600, 786).”
From Sources of Vascular Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [786]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Robbins, I. M., Hemnes, A. R., Simon Gibbs, J., Christman, B. W., Howard, L., Meehan, S., Cabrita, I., Gonzalez, R., Oyler, T., Zhao, L., Du, R.-H., Mendes, L. A., & Wilkins, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Robbins, Ivan M.
- Venue
- Experimental Lung Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 0190-2148 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0499
- OpenAlex
- W2139814745
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Lung Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Thoracic Society
- European Respiratory Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Keywords
- sapropterin dihydrochloride, tetrahydrobiopterin, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, drug safety, sildenafil, endothelin receptor antagonists, nitric oxide production, oxidative stress, inflammation, MCP-1, exercise capacity, 6-minute walk distance, dose escalation
- MeSH terms
- Sildenafil Citrate, Administration, Oral, Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Biopterins, Drug Therapy, Combination, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, London, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide, Peptide Fragments, Piperazines, Purines, Sulfones, Tennessee, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Walking, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Oxidative Stress, Chemokine CCL2, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Recovery of Function, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors, Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review