The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Westmead Head Injury Project outcome in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT variables
Abstract
A prospective study of 315 consecutive patients with a severe head injury was undertaken to study factors contributing to mortality and morbidity, both in the pre-hospital and hospital phases. Entry criteria were a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less after non-surgical resuscitation within 6 h of the injury, or a deterioration to that level within 48 h. Patients with gunshot wounds or who were dead on arrival were excluded. End points of the study were either death or at 6 months after the injury. Predictors of mortality were increasing age, the presence of hypotension, a low GCS, abnormal motor responses and pupillary non-reactivity. In the 167 patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured, raised ICP and failure to respond to treatment for raised ICP also predicted mortality. Three CT predictors of mortality were the presence of cerebral oedema, intraventricular blood and the degree of midline shift. When analysed using logistic regression, the most accurate model (accuracy 84.4%) included increasing age, abnormal motor responses and the three CT indicators. Analysis of the data for 'good' (Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) 1 and 2) vs 'poor' (GOS 3 and 4) survival at 6 months was also performed using logistic regression. The model which provided the most accurate prediction of poor outcome included age, hypotension and three different CT characteristics, subarachnoid blood, intracerebral haematoma or intracerebral contusion (accuracy 72.5%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Cited by
Spaite, D. W., Hu, C., Bobrow, B. J., Chikani, V., Barnhart, B., Gaither, J. B., Denninghoff, K. R., Adelson, P. D., Keim, S. M., Viscusi, C., et al. (2017) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.007 · Cited by 187
Blicher, J. U., & Nielsen, J. F. (2008) · NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.3233/nre-2008-23207 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Fearnside, M. R., Cook, R. J., McDougall, P., & McNeil, R. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-279
- ISSN
- 0268-8697 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-046X
- OpenAlex
- W2156972544
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.