Cited by 17Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsHip and Femur Fractures

Fall-Related Self-efficacy in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living is Associated with Falls in Older Community-Living People

Hellström, Karin, Sandström, Marie, Heideken Wågert, Petra, Sandborgh, Maria, Söderlund, Anne, Thors Adolfsson, Eva, Johansson, Ann-Christin·2013·Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify fall risk factors in community-living people 75 years or older. Methods: From a random selection of 525 older adults, a total of 378 (72%) individuals participated in the study. Mean age was 81.7 years (range 75–101 years). A study-specific questionnaire including self-reported fall history for the past 6 months, the Falls-Efficacy Scale (Swedish version: FES(S)) and EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ5D) was used. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to find risk factors for falls. Results: The strongest significant predictor of falls was scoring low on FES(S) in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), with an odds ratio of 7.89 (95% confidence interval 2.93–21.25). One fifth had experienced one or more falls during the past 6 months. Both fall-related self-efficacy and health-related quality of life were significantly lower among fallers. Conclusion: Our results imply that identifying community-living older adults with an increased risk of falling should include a measure of fall-related self-efficacy in IADL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02703181.2013.792912

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of ADLs allows conclusions about physical and cognitive status, provides information about frailty, and allows predictions about risk of falling.

    “The measurement of ADLs allows conclusions to be drawn about the physical and cognitive status, provides information about frailty, and allows predictions about the risk of falling ( (Nourhashemi et al. 2001), (Hellström et al. 2013), (Tinetti et al. 1994)).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 17

Authors
Hellström, K., Sandström, M., Heideken Wågert, P., Sandborgh, M., Söderlund, A., Thors Adolfsson, E., & Johansson, A.-C.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hellström, Karin
Venue
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics
Published
2013-05-24
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
128-139
ISSN
  • 0270-3181 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3152
OpenAlex
W2126443701
Cited by
17
References
35
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
Keywords
fall-related self-efficacy, instrumental activities of daily living, falls in older adults, fall risk factors, community-dwelling older adults, health-related quality of life, Falls Efficacy Scale, fall prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review