The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Ocular Surface: From Bench to Bedside
Abstract
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is an emerging technology that provides minimally invasive, high resolution, steady-state assessment of the ocular surface at the cellular level. Several challenges still remain but, at present, IVCM may be considered a promising technique for clinical diagnosis and management. This mini-review summarizes some key findings in IVCM of the ocular surface, focusing on recent and promising attempts to move “from bench to bedside”. IVCM allows prompt diagnosis, disease course follow-up, and management of potentially blinding atypical forms of infectious processes, such as acanthamoeba and fungal keratitis. This technology has improved our knowledge of corneal alterations and some of the processes that affect the visual outcome after lamellar keratoplasty and excimer keratorefractive surgery. In dry eye disease, IVCM has provided new information on the whole-ocular surface morphofunctional unit. It has also improved understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms and helped in the assessment of prognosis and treatment. IVCM is particularly useful in the study of corneal nerves, enabling description of the morphology, density, and disease- or surgically induced alterations of nerves, particularly the subbasal nerve plexus. In glaucoma, IVCM constitutes an important aid to evaluate filtering blebs, to better understand the conjunctival wound healing process, and to assess corneal changes induced by topical antiglaucoma medications and their preservatives. IVCM has significantly enhanced our understanding of the ocular response to contact lens wear. It has provided new perspectives at a cellular level on a wide range of contact lens complications, revealing findings that were not previously possible to image in the living human eye. The final section of this mini-review provides a focus on advances in confocal microscopy imaging. These include 2D wide-field mapping, 3D reconstruction of the cornea and automated image analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-related islet autoantibody incidence in offspring of patients with type 1 diabetes
the BABYDIAB-BABYDIET Study Group, Ziegler, A.-G., & Bonifacio, E. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2472-x · Cited by 264
Cited by
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease
Cruzat, A., Qazi, Y., & Hamrah, P. (2017) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.004 · Cited by 364
Self-citationInflammatory Response in Dry Eye
Yamaguchi, T. (2018) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23651 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Villani, E., Baudouin, C., Efron, N., Hamrah, P., Kojima, T., Patel, S. V., Pflugfelder, S. C., Zhivov, A., & Dogru, M.
- Venue
- Current Eye Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-231
- ISSN
- 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2202
- OpenAlex
- W2122769365
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Ocular Surface: From Bench to Bedside. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02713683.2013.842592
- The paper
- Villani, E., Baudouin, C., Efron, N., Hamrah, P., Kojima, T., Patel, S. V., Pflugfelder, S. C., Zhivov, A., & Dogru, M. (2014). In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Ocular Surface: From Bench to Bedside. Current Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2013.842592
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.