A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Interactive Voice Response Telephone System and Specialist Nurse Support for Childhood Asthma Management
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of an automated interactive voice response system (IVR) and Specialist Nurse Support to reduce health care utilization and improve health-related quality of life in children with asthma. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial in 121 children with doctor-diagnosed asthma and an acute presentation with asthma in the previous 12 months aged between 3 and 16 years. Children were randomized to one of three groups for a 6-month intervention receiving asthma education and management support from a Specialist Nurse by telephone or e-mail (N = 41), from IVR (N = 39), or receiving usual care (control group; N = 41). Outcomes included health care utilization and use of oral steroid rescue. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory were collected at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant benefit identified for either the IVR or the Nurse Support interventions for health care utilization, use of oral steroid rescue, or HRQOL compared with controls. Relative to controls, the incremental costs were -A$225.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -A$840, A$391) per child for the Nurse Support intervention and -A$451.45 (-A$1075, A$173) per child for IVR. The results were most sensitive to the frequency of admissions to hospital. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that both IVR and Nurse Support interventions may be cost-saving from a health system perspective, with IVR providing the greatest benefit and this pilot study provides a strong basis for developing larger trials with longer follow-up.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methodological quality was good in 3 studies (range: 20-25).
“Methodological quality was good in 3 studies (range: 20-25) [53,79,80]”
From Effectiveness and Acceptability of Asynchronous Digital Health in Asthma Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [80]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Xu, C., Jackson, M., Scuffham, P. A., Wootton, R., Simpson, P., Whitty, J., Wolfe, R., & Wainwright, C. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU)
- Griffith University (AU)
- University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Cathy
- Venue
- Journal of Asthma
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08-18
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 768-773
- ISSN
- 0277-0903 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4303
- OpenAlex
- W2050465315
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Asthma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Asthma Foundations Australia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- childhood asthma, interactive voice response, telephone health education, health care utilization, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, hospitalization, pediatric asthma management
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Nurses, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review