Cited by 79Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Assessment of Dyspnea in Asthma: Validation of the Dyspnea-12

Open access
Yorke, Janelle, Russell, Anne-Marie, Swigris, Jeff, Shuldham, Caroline, Haigh, Carol, Rochnia, Nikki, Hoyle, Jennifer, Jones, Paul W.·2011·Journal of Asthma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a prominent symptom in asthma. The Dyspnea-12 (D-12), an instrument that quantifies breathlessness using 12 descriptors that tap the physical and affective aspects, has shown promise for the measurement of dyspnea in cardiorespiratory disease. OBJECTIVE: We report the results of a study designed to test the validity and reliability of the D-12 in a population of patients with asthma. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 102 patients with asthma. Subjects completed the D-12, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Medical Research Council scale. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-component structure of the D-12 (i.e., seven items that tap the physical aspects of breathlessness and five items that tap the affective aspects). RESULTS: The D-12 subscales had excellent internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha for the "physical" score was 0.94 and the affective score was 0.95). The D-12 physical component was more strongly correlated with SGRQ Symptoms (r = 0.648), SGRQ Activities (r = 0.635) and Medical Research Council grade (r = 0.636), while the affective component was more strongly correlated with SGRQ Impacts (r = 0.765) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale scores (anxiety r = 0.641 and depression r = 0.602). CONCLUSION: This study supports validity of the D-12 for use in the assessment of dyspnea of patients with asthma. It assesses one of the most pertinent symptoms of asthma from two viewpoints-physical and affective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02770903.2011.585412

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]Simon PM Schwartzstein RM Woodrow J Fencl V Teghtsoonian M Weinberger SE Distinguishable sensations of breathlessness in patients with shortness of breath Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1990 142 1009 1014 2240820
  2. [18]Yorke J Swigirs J Russell AM Moosavi SH Kwong G Ng Man Longshaw M Jones PW Dyspnoea-12 is a valid and reliable measure of breathlessness in patients with ILD Chest 2011 139 1 159 64 20595454 PMC3035488
  3. [24]ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 166 111e17 12091180
  4. [26]Suhr DD Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? 2006 Paper #200-31, 31st SAS users group international conference San Francisco

Authors
Yorke, J., Russell, A.-M., Swigris, J., Shuldham, C., Haigh, C., Rochnia, N., Hoyle, J., & Jones, P. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Salford (GB)
  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • North Manchester General Hospital (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Yorke, Janelle
Venue
Journal of Asthma
Published
2011-06-02
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
602-608
ISSN
  • 0277-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4303
OpenAlex
W2139616518
Cited by
79
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Asthma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL092227)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
asthma, dyspnea, symptom assessment, psychometric validation, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, anxiety and depression, Medical Research Council scale, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Dyspnea, Exercise Test, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Vital Capacity, Reproducibility of Results, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review