Cited by 79Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries up to 1999-2003 followed to the end of 2006. A critical overview of the results

Open access
Storm, Hans H., Engholm, Gerda, Hakulinen, Timo, Tryggvadóttir, Laufey, Klint, Åsa, Gislum, Mette, Kejs, Anne Mette T., Bray, Freddie·2010·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Differences in Nordic cancer patient survival observed today originate from the 1970s, but were first identified in a mortality prediction from 1995. This paper provides timely comparisons of survival using NORDCAN, a database with comparable information from the Nordic cancer registries. Elucidation of the differences is important when monitoring cancer care generally and evaluating the impact of cancer plans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The NORDCAN database 1964-2003 with follow-up for death through 2006, was used to analyse incidence, mortality, and survival for all NORDCAN cancer sites. We analysed 5-year relative survival and excess mortality rates in the first three months and 2-5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: The time trends in survival 1989-2003 were largely similar between the Nordic countries with increases in 14 sites among men and 16 among women. In all countries the excess mortality rates were highest in the first three months after diagnosis, but decreased to similar levels across all countries 2-5 years after diagnosis. Comparing countries excess mortality was highest in Denmark irrespective of follow-up period. Lower survival was observed for Danish cancer patients in 23 of the 33 cancer sites in men and 26 of 35 sites in women. Low and similar levels of survival were observed for cancers of the oesophagus, lung, liver and pancreas, while an 8-10 percentage point difference in survival was found between countries for colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The notable differences in Nordic cancer patient survival can be linked to national variations in risk factors, co-morbidity, and the implementation of screening. Improved treatment and primary prevention, in particular the targeting of tobacco and alcohol use, is required to improve cancer control. The recently-initiated cancer plans in Denmark and Norway are yet to show an observable effect on the corresponding cancer survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02841861003801148

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cutler SJ, editor. International symposium on end results of
  2. cancer therapy. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1964;15:1 -446.
  3. M ø rck HI, Linde J, Agner E, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F, [38] Nielsen PE. [Tobacco consumption and smoking patterns in the Nordic countries] (in Danish). Nordisk Medicin 1982;97:134 -46.

Authors
Storm, H. H., Engholm, G., Hakulinen, T., Tryggvadóttir, L., Klint, Å., Gislum, M., Kejs, A. M. T., & Bray, F.
Affiliations
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • Finnish Cancer Registry (FI)
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Storm, Hans H.
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2010-01
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
532-544
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2057783039
Cited by
79
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
cancer survival, excess mortality, relative survival, cross-national comparison, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, cancer control plans, cancer screening, alcohol and tobacco use, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Denmark, Female, Finland, Humans, Iceland, International Cooperation, Male, Mortality, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Norway, Registries, Risk Factors, Smoking, Sweden, Comorbidity, Survival Rate, Survival Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review