Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective outcome analysis in 185 patients

Open access
Sanuki, Naoko, Takeda, Atsuya, Oku, Yohei, Mizuno, Tomikazu, Aoki, Yosuke, Eriguchi, Takahisa, Iwabuchi, Shogo, Kunieda, Etsuo·2014·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, we have treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) uniformly at two dose levels, according to baseline liver function and normal liver dose. We retrospectively examined the outcomes for these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, 221 HCC patients were treated with SBRT. Eligibility criteria for SBRT included a single (either solitary or recurrent) HCC lesion; unfeasible, difficult or refusal to undergo other surgery or percutaneous ablative therapies; Child-Pugh Classification (CPC) A or B; tumors ≤ 5 cm; dose to the bowels < 25 Gy/5 fractions; curative intent. Patients followed up ≥ 6 months were eligible. The prescribed dose depended on liver function and liver dose: 40 Gy for CPC-A and 35 Gy for CPC-B, in 5 fractions, requiring a 5-Gy dose reduction if the proportion of the liver receiving ≥ 20 Gy exceeded 20%. Treatment outcomes and safety were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients (n = 48 in the 35-Gy group; n = 137 in the 40-Gy group) were eligible, with a median follow-up duration of 24 months (range 3-80). The three-year local control and overall survival rates were 91% and 70%, respectively. There were no significant differences in outcomes between dose levels: the three-year local control and overall survival rates in the 35-Gy and 40-Gy groups were 91% and 89% (log-rank p = 0.99) and 66% and 72% (p = 0.54), respectively. Acute toxicities ≥ grade 3 were observed in 24 (13.0%) patients, and 19 (10.3%) patients had worsening of CPC score by two points. All but three (1.6%) patients promptly recovered to grade 1-2. Grade 5 liver failure occurred in two patients in the 35-Gy group. CONCLUSION: SBRT for HCC was safe and provided equivalent outcomes when administered either in 35 or 40 Gy/5 fractions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0284186x.2013.820342

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Metadata

Authors
Sanuki, N., Takeda, A., Oku, Y., Mizuno, T., Aoki, Y., Eriguchi, T., Iwabuchi, S., & Kunieda, E.
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2013-08-21
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
399-404
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W1981779460
Cited by
260
References
13
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective outcome analysis in 185 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/0284186x.2013.820342
The paper
Sanuki, N., Takeda, A., Oku, Y., Mizuno, T., Aoki, Y., Eriguchi, T., Iwabuchi, S., & Kunieda, E. (2014). Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective outcome analysis in 185 patients. Acta Oncologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2013.820342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.