The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reconstruction of the Defective Mandible
Abstract
In a clinical material consisting of 31 cases of mandibular defects, caused by tumour resection or by trauma, reconstruction has been carried out by means of a stabilizing titanium splint and autologous bone and marrow transplantation, the longest period of observation being 9 years. The functional results obtained are assessed with reference to the cause of resection. Different technical procedures are described and the objectives and the planning of reconstruction of the lower jaw are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Referral patterns of general dental practitioners for bone grafting and implant placement
Gupta, B., Shadbolt, B., & Hyam, D. (2017) · Australian Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/adj.12507 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Brånemark, P.-I., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., Breine, U., Jeppson, P.-H., & Öhman, A.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1975-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-128
- ISSN
- 0036-5556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106161272
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstruction of the Defective Mandible. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02844317509022776
- The paper
- Brånemark, P.-I., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., Breine, U., Jeppson, P.-H., & Öhman, A. (1975). Reconstruction of the Defective Mandible. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317509022776
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
