Prediction of quality of life in patients with tinnitus
Abstract
According to epidemiological studies of tinnitus prevalence, 0.5-1% of respondents report that tinnitus severely affects their ability to lead a normal life. In the present investigation quality of life and its association with tinnitus-related factors: psychological, psychosomatic and audiological, was studied based on a sample of 122 patients, who attended the hearing clinic for distress due to tinnitus. A stepwise regression analysis was performed with quality of life as a dependent variable. Six of 13 variables included in the model proved to be significant regressors and to explain 65% of the variance. The six predictor variables were: impaired concentration, feeling depressed, perceived negative attitudes, hypersensitivity to sounds, average hearing level (best ear) and tinnitus duration (the shorter the duration of tinnitus the more negative impact on quality of life). The three most significant predictors were directly related to perceived psychological distress and explained most of the variance in quality of life in tinnitus patients included in this study. An unexpected finding was that fluctuations in tinnitus, vertigo, headache or perceived social support did not prove to belong to the significant regressors. The results are discussed in view of the construct of quality of life, depressive cognitions and social support in general, as well as in tinnitus-specific life circumstances.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological symptoms, rather than audiological components, are reported to affect quality of life in patients with tinnitus, with psychological parameters explaining 61% of the variance in quality of life and audiological parameters explaining only 4%.
“Psychological symptoms, rather than audiological components, are reported to affect QoL in patients with tinnitus, with psychological parameters explaining 61% of the variance in QoL and audiological parameters explaining only 4% 22 .”
From The effect of psychological inflexibility on health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with chronic tinnitus without hearing loss (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Erlandsson, S. I., & Hallberg, L. R.-M.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Erlandsson, S. I.
- Venue
- British Journal of Audiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-19
- ISSN
- 0300-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129995323
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Audiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
- Keywords
- tinnitus, quality of life, predictors of quality of life, psychological distress, depression, impaired concentration, tinnitus duration, hearing level, social support
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Tinnitus, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review