Circadian Typology and Sensation Seeking in Adolescents
Abstract
The relationship of circadian typology with personality has been largely studied in adults, but there are few studies exploring such relationship in adolescents. Adolescence has been associated with a greater tendency to eveningness preference, sleeping problems, poorer academic achievement, earlier substance use, or risky behaviors, and it is suggested that this association might be mediated by personality factors. Given the relevance of identifying the behavioral outcomes of young evening types to detect and prevent health problems, the present study aimed to explore, for the first time, the relationship between sensation seeking and circadian typology in an adolescent sample of 688 students (51.45% boys) from 12 to 16 yrs old. They answered the Spanish versions of the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children (MESC) and the Junior Sensation Seeking Scale (J-SSS), which includes four subscales measuring Thrill and Adventure Seeking, Experience Seeking, Disinhibition, and Boredom Susceptibility. Analyses showed that boys obtained significantly higher scores than girls on J-SSS total score and all subscales except Boredom Susceptibility, whereas evening-type adolescents of both sexes scored significantly higher than neither types and than morning types on J-SSS total score. These results indicate that evening-type adolescents show a greater desire for varied, new, complex, and intense sensations, and they are ready for experiencing more risks than morning types. The implications of this study suggest the need of being aware of individual differences in the SS trait in evening-type adolescents, as well as taking into account the wide variety of behaviors associated with it, either prosocial or antisocial, to design better preventive health and academic programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The association between late chronotype and current smoking could be at least partially explained by affective and emotional traits common to both smokers and late chronotypes.
“The association between late chronotype and current smoking could be at least partially explained by evidence showing that several affective and emotional traits are common to both smokers and late chronotypes.”
From Smoking, screen-based sedentary behavior, and diet associated with habitual sleep duration and chronotype: data from the UK Biobank (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Muro, A., Gomà-i-Freixanet, M., & Adan, A.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
- Universitat de Barcelona
- Corresponding author
- Muro, Anna
- ORCID
- Muro, Anna
- Venue
- Chronobiology International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-11-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1376-1382
- ISSN
- 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-6073
- OpenAlex
- W2120436240
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- chronotype, sensation seeking, adolescents, sex differences, thrill and adventure seeking, experience seeking, disinhibition, boredom susceptibility, personality, risk-taking
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Sensation, Sex Factors, Sleep, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review