CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does one hour of bright or short-wavelength filtered tablet screenlight have a meaningful effect on adolescents’ pre-bedtime alertness, sleep, and daytime functioning?

Heath, Melanie, Sutherland, Cate, Bartel, Kate, Gradisar, Michael, Williamson, Paul, Lovato, Nicole, Micic, Gorica·2014·Chronobiology International
DOI 10.3109/07420528.2013.872121
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electronic media use is prevalent among adolescent populations, as is the frequency of sleeplessness. One mechanism proposed for technology affecting adolescents' sleep is the alerting effects from bright screens. Two explanations are provided. First, screens emit significant amounts of short-wavelength light (i.e. blue), which produces acute alertness and alters sleep timing. Second, later chronotypes are hypothesised to be hypersensitive to evening light. This study analysed the pre-sleep alertness (GO/NOGO task speed, accuracy; subjective sleepiness), sleep (sleep diary, polysomnography), and morning functioning of 16 healthy adolescents (M = 17.4 ± 1.9 yrs, 56% f) who used a bright tablet screen (80 lux), dim screen (1 lux) and a filtered short-wavelength screen (f.lux; 50 lux) for 1 hr before their usual bedtime in a within-subjects protocol. Chronotype was analysed as a continuous between-subjects factor; however, no significant interactions occurred. Significant effects occurred between bright and dim screens for GO/NOGO speed and accuracy. However, the magnitude of these differences was small (e.g. GO/NOGO speed = 23 ms, accuracy = 13%), suggesting minimal clinical significance. No significant effects were found for sleep onset latency, slow-rolling eye movements, or the number of SWS and REM minutes in the first two sleep cycles. Future independent studies are needed to test short (1 hr) vs longer (>2 hrs) screen usage to provide evidence for safe-to-harmful levels of screenlight exposure before adolescents' usual bedtime.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07420528.2013.872121

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Borbély AA, 1982, Hum Neurobiol, 1, 195
  2. Cajochen C, 1992, Sleep, 15, 337
  3. Chang A, 2012, Sleep, 35, A205
  4. Eggermont S, 2006, 42, 428
  5. Figueiro MG, 2011, Neuro Endocrinol Lett, 32, 158
  6. Gaina A, 2006, J Sleep Res, 15, 266
  7. Krahn L, 2013, Sleep, 36, A184
  8. Lee EK, 2010, 55, 403
  9. National Sleep Foundation, 2011, 2011 Sleep in America Poll: Communication technology in the bedroom
  10. Roberts DF, 1999, Kids and media at the new millennium
  11. Waggoner TL, 2005, PseudoIsochromatic plate Ishihara compatible (PIPIC): Colour vision test: 24 plate edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–122 of 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heath, M., Sutherland, C., Bartel, K., Gradisar, M., Williamson, P., Lovato, N., & Micic, G.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gradisar, Michael
ORCID
Venue
Chronobiology International
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-01-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
496-505
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
DOI
10.3109/07420528.2013.872121
OpenAlex
W2161789805
Cited by
122
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
blue light, short-wavelength light, adolescents, sleep latency, chronotype, sleep quality, daytime functioning, go/no-go task, sleepiness, screen time before bedtime
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Activity Cycles, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Cognition, Humans, Light, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Photoperiod, Computers, Handheld, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review