Cited by 39Circadian rhythm and melatoninStress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Resynchronization of the Circadian Corticosterone Rhythm After a Light/Dark Shift in Juvenile and Adult Mice

Weinert, Dietmar, Eimert, Heike, Erkert, Hans G., Schneyer, Ulrich·1994·Chronobiology International

Abstract

Most of the extensive literature concerning the resynchronization of circadian rhythms after a Zeitgeber shift is devoted to the dependence of resynchronization on the mode of the shift and the strength of the Zeitgeber, as well as on the circadian function investigated. Ontogenetic influences have rarely been investigated. Therefore, we studied the resynchronization of several circadian rhythms in juvenile and adult female laboratory mice. We present here the results concerning the corticosterone rhythm. The daily rhythms were determined as transverse profiles (2-h intervals) before as well as 3, 7, and 14 days after an 8-h phase delay of the light/dark cycle produced by a single prolongation of dark time. The corticosterone concentration in serum was determined radioimmunologically. In the control animals the daily patterns were bimodal, with main maxima at the end of the light time and secondary ones just after lights on. Ontogenetic differences were small. In adult mice the amplitude was slightly increased due to an increase in the maximum values, and the time of highest hormone concentrations was slightly phase advanced. In juvenile mice, a distinct daily pattern with a phase position in relation to the light/dark cycle corresponding to that of control animals was present on the 3rd day after the Zeitgeber shift. The daily mean as well as the minimum and maximum values increased initially and reached the values of control animals during the second week. In adult animals, a pronounced daily rhythm with the normal phase position was present only at the 7th postshift day. The amplitude, daily mean, and maximum values were decreased, and the minimum values were increased. The initial values were not reached even after 2 weeks. The results show that resynchronization was faster in juvenile mice compared with adult mice. As a possible cause for the observed age-related differences, a not yet stabilized phase-coupling between various circadian rhythms is supposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07420529409067791

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence in the literature that there might be a pubertal shift in the timing of daily rhythms in other species, including rhesus macaques, laboratory mice, and fat sand rats.

    “We also found evidence in the literature that there might be a pubertal shift in the timing of daily rhythms in other species, including rhesus macaques (Figure 2B), laboratory mice, and fat sand rats [60, 137, 197, 199, further reviewed in 70].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 39

Authors
Weinert, D., Eimert, H., Erkert, H. G., & Schneyer, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Hospital in Halle (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
1994-01
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
222-231
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2170015908
Cited by
39
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
phase lag, ontogeny, juvenile mice, adult mice, age differences, phase coupling, serum corticosterone
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Corticosterone, Darkness, Female, Light, Mice, Inbred ICR, Time Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review