Cited by 216Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Probiotic approach to prevent antibiotic resistance

Open access
Ouwehand, Arthur C., Forssten, Sofia, Hibberd, Ashley A., Lyra, Anna, Stahl, Buffy·2016·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

Probiotics are live microorganisms, mainly belonging to the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, although also strain of other species are commercialized, that have a beneficial effect on the host. From the perspective of antibiotic use, probiotics have been observed to reduce the risk of certain infectious disease such as certain types of diarrhea and respiratory tract infection. This may be accompanied with a reduced need of antibiotics for secondary infections. Antibiotics tend to be effective against most common diseases, but increasingly resistance is being observed among pathogens. Probiotics are specifically selected to not contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance and not carry transferable antibiotic resistance. Concomitant use of probiotics with antibiotics has been observed to reduce the incidence, duration and/or severity of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. This contributes to better adherence to the antibiotic prescription and thereby reduces the evolution of resistance. To what extent probiotics directly reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance is still much under investigation; but maintaining a balanced microbiota during antibiotic use may certainly provide opportunities for reducing the spread of resistances. Key messages Probiotics may reduce the risk for certain infectious diseases and thereby reduce the need for antibiotics. Probiotics may reduce the risk for antibiotic-associated diarrhea Probiotics do not contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance and may even reduce it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07853890.2016.1161232

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bacterial probiotics are often sensitive to commonly used antibiotics (e.g., penicillin, tetracycline, and ofloxacin), limiting their viability during therapy.

    “However, bacterial probiotics are often sensitive to commonly used antibiotics (e.g., penicillin, tetracycline, and ofloxacin), limiting their viability during therapy.6,7”

    From Safety and efficacy concerns in Indian probiotics: Insights from whole-genome sequencing and <i>in vitro</i> assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The “Probiotics’ antibiotic resistance profiles” section says resistance to ampicillin is atypical in lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria, and tetracycline resistance is relatively low in some probiotic Lactobacillus species. It does not establish sensitivity to ofloxacin or say that antibiotic sensitivity limits probiotic viability during therapy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 216

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics con- sensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506-14.
  2. Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU, O'Toole PW, Hill C, Gahan CG. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiin- fective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7617-21.

Authors
Ouwehand, A. C., Forssten, S., Hibberd, A. A., Lyra, A., & Stahl, B.
Affiliations
  • DuPont (Finland) (FI)
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ouwehand, Arthur C.
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
2016-03-26
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
246-255
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
OpenAlex
W2333275146
Cited by
216
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
probiotics, antibiotic resistance, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, antibiotic use, gut microbiota, secondary infection, respiratory infections, diarrhea prevention, antibiotic adherence
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bifidobacterium, Diarrhea, Humans, Lactobacillus, Incidence, Probiotics, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review