The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications
Open accessAbstract
The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. This paper examines the acceptability, reliability, validity, discriminatory power and responsiveness to change of its health state descriptive system and valuation system and presents some examples of applications. As a profile measure on roughly comparable dimensions the 15D performs equally well as the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and SF-20, in some respects even better, and clearly better than EQ-5D. The remaining nine to ten dimensions of the 15D provide a large reserve in terms of discriminatory power and responsiveness to change. The valuation system is based on an application of the multiattribute utility theory. The single index score (15D score) on a 0-1 scale, representing the overall HRQoL, is calculated from the health state descriptive system by using a set of population-based preference or utility weights. The 15D scores are shown to be highly reliable, sensitive and responsive to change, generalisable at least in Western-type societies, and particularly valid for deriving quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for resource allocation purposes. The instrument is recommended by the Washington Panel and is available in several languages for clinical economic evaluation and population studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
EuroQol: the current state of play
Brooks, R. (1996) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 · Cited by 5,815
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339
Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification
Guyatt, G. H., Deyo, R. A., Charlson, M., Levine, M. N., & Mitchell, A. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90128-5 · Cited by 480
An approach to measuring and valuing health states
Sintonen, H. (1981) · Social Science & Medicine. Part C: Medical Economics · doi:10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Cited by
Geocadin, R. G., Callaway, C. W., Fink, E. L., Golan, E., Greer, D. M., Ko, N. U., Lang, E., Licht, D. J., Marino, B. S., McNair, N. D., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000702 · Cited by 428
Della Corte, L., Di Filippo, C., Gabrielli, O., Reppuccia, S., La Rosa, V. L., Ragusa, R., Fichera, M., Commodari, E., Bifulco, G., & Giampaolino, P. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17134683 · Cited by 387
Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs
Räsänen, P., Paavolainen, P., Sintonen, H., Koivisto, A.-M., Blom, M., Ryynänen, O.-P., & Roine, R. P. (2007) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453670610013501 · Cited by 381
Self-citationPredicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: A health economic analysis
Jenkins, P. J., Clement, N. D., Hamilton, D. F., Gaston, P., Patton, J. T., & Howie, C. R. (2013) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b1.29835 · Cited by 326
Malnutrition and quality of life in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rasheed, S., & Woods, R. T. (2013) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2012.11.003 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Sintonen, H.
- Venue
- Annals of Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 328-336
- ISSN
- 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2060
- OpenAlex
- W2168973485
- Cited by
- 1,217
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07853890109002086
- The paper
- Sintonen, H. (2001). The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.