Vascular stiffness and endothelial dysfunction: Correlations at different levels of blood pressure
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Resistant hypertensive (RHTN) patients have endothelial dysfunction and aldosterone excess, which contribute to the development of resistance to antihypertensive treatment and cardiovascular complications. Biophysical forces within the arterial wall provide functional regulation of arterial stiffness. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (FMD) can be used to evaluate vascular stiffness and endothelial function. Although both techniques have been used in several studies in hypertensive patients, it is unknown whether endothelial dysfunction is also associated with vascular stiffness in RHTN patients. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three consecutive subjects were divided in three groups: 44 RHTN, 35 well-controlled hypertensive patients (HTN) and 25 normal healthy volunteers (NT). FMD was measured by high-resolution ultrasound and PWV was calculated from measurements of the pulse transit time and the distance traveled by the pulse between carotid and femoral arteries. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in respect to body mass index, age or other biochemical variables among the three groups. FMD (NO-dependent) values were statistically different when comparing RHTN and well controlled HTN patients (respectively, 8.3 ± 4.7% and 10.1 ± 5.9%) and 12.3 ± 6.3% in normal subjects (p < 0.05). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in BP-adjusted PWV between RHTN and HTN (13.9 ± 1.0 and 11.5 ± 1.1 m/s, respectively; p < 0.05). FMD (NO-dependent) and PWV-adjusted values were strongly correlated in well-controlled HTN and NT subjects (r = - 0.74 and - 0.83, respectively). Although statistically significant, this correlation was lower in RHTN patients (r = - 0.43). CONCLUSION: We found a close relationship among high BP levels, endothelial dysfunction and vascular rigidity in hypertensive patients, demonstrated by a significantly higher increase in carotid-femoral PWV and a decrease in brachial artery FMD in RHTN when compared with well-controlled hypertensive patients. Although this study was not designed to test the prognostic, the vascular damage differences observed between patients with controlled vs uncontrolled hypertension suggest that the latter group may have a worse cardiovascular prognosis, requiring prospective assessment tests.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The endothelium has a role in the etiology of hypertension and arterial stiffness.
“Long-standing evidence has suggested a role for the endothelium in the etiology of hypertension and arterial stiffness48,49.”
From An inflammatory aging clock (iAge) based on deep learning tracks multimorbidity, immunosenescence, frailty and cardiovascular aging (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 98
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Landmesser U, Drexler H. Endothelial function and hyper- 8. tension. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22:316 -320.
- Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Pujia A, Ventura G, Iacopino 9. S, Scozzafava A, et al. Prognostic signifi cance of endothe- lial dysfunction in hypertensive patients. Circulation. 2001; 104:191 -196.
- O ' Rourke MF. Wave travel and refl ection in the arterial sys- 17. tem. J Hypertens Suppl. 1999;17:S45 -S47.
- Authors
- Figueiredo, V. N., Yugar-Toledo, J. C., Martins, L. C., Martins, L. B., de Faria, A. P. C., de Haro Moraes, C., Sierra, C., Coca, A., & Moreno, H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Moreno, Heitor
- Venue
- Blood Pressure
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-10-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-38
- ISSN
- 0803-7051 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1999
- OpenAlex
- W2059098207
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Blood Pressure (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Keywords
- resistant hypertension, vascular stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation, brachial artery, nitric oxide, aldosterone, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Brachial Artery, Carotid Arteries, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Femoral Artery, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide, Prospective Studies, Pulsatile Flow, Ultrasonography, Case-Control Studies, Vascular Stiffness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review