The meaning of care on a locked acute psychiatric ward: Patients’ experiences
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The deinstitutionalization of psychiatric care has led to a concentration of patients to fewer wards. This leads to difficulties in separating voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients, and there is a risk that the interest in safeguarding patients' autonomy will decrease. AIMS: The aim of this study was to elucidate the meaning care has to patients on a locked acute psychiatric ward. The study was performed on a ward for patients with affective and eating disorders who were admitted both voluntarily and involuntarily. METHODS: Interviews were conducted and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The results show that to the patients, care had contradictory qualities some alleviated their suffering while others contributed to stress. The alleviation from suffering originated from the experiences of strengthened integrity and self-determination, from being supported, and having a place of refuge on the ward. In contrast to this, there were experiences of being dependent and trapped because of lack of influence and choice, and being controlled. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this qualitative study shows that to the patients, care can mean being disciplined in a way that risks undermining the alleviation of suffering that care can provide. It is thus important to be observant when it comes to manifestations of control in care. The study also shows that the support of fellow patients has a value as a complement to the care given by staff members and next of kin, something that needs to be further investigated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Locked wards were experienced as controlling.
“While locked wards were experienced as controlling [51,76]”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [76]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Johansson, I. M., Skärsäter, I., & Danielson, E.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Mid Sweden University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Johansson, Inger M.
- ORCID
- Skärsäter, Ingela
- Venue
- Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 501-507
- ISSN
- 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-9488
- 1502-4725
- OpenAlex
- W2146730230
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- acute psychiatric care, patient experience, deinstitutionalization, mood disorders, eating disorders, patient autonomy, self-determination, peer support
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Dependency, Psychological, Female, Hospitals, General, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Security Measures, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Sweden, Patient Satisfaction, Mood Disorders, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review