Cited by 26Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Disulfiram in severe alcoholism–an open controlled study

Ulrichsen, Jakob, Nielsen, Mogens Kai, Ulrichsen, Michelle·2010·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disulfiram is used to a great extent in Denmark to treat alcoholism but the evidence is limited. AIM: To study the effect of supervised disulfiram treatment in alcohol dependence. Subjects were recruited from a psychiatric emergency ward following alcohol withdrawal treatment. METHODS: A total of n=39 patients were openly randomized to either disulfiram 800 mg twice a week for 26 weeks (n=19) or no disulfiram (n=20). All patients were also treated with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in groups. RESULTS: The rate of abstinence was 20% and 26% in the control and disulfiram group, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (NS). A trend towards increased mean time to first drink was found in the disulfiram group (96 vs. 76 days in the control group, NS), while fewer patients in this group completed CBT group therapy (41% vs. 67% in the control group, NS). Alcohol-free days were 100 days in both groups (NS). CONCLUSION: Supervised disulfiram administration did not have any major impact on the treatment outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08039481003686180

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In combined control groups, six participants reported serious adverse events requiring hospitalization from three studies.

    “In the combined control groups, six participants reported serious adverse events requiring hospitalization from three studies [38], [39], [42].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 26

Authors
Ulrichsen, J., Nielsen, M. K., & Ulrichsen, M.
Affiliations
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Ulrichsen, Jakob
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-03-18
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
356-362
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2079342742
Cited by
26
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond
  • Fonden til Lægevidenskabens Fremme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
disulfiram, alcoholism, alcohol withdrawal, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, abstinence, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Alcohol Deterrents, Alcoholism, Ambulatory Care, Combined Modality Therapy, Denmark, Disulfiram, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Group, Temperance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review