The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DISSOLUTION OF FIBERS INHALED BY RATS
Abstract
This article provides an analysis and an interpretation of the results of an inhalation study of the durability of several man-made vitreous fiber (MMVF) insulation wool samples in rats. The study was sponsored by the Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association and was conducted by the Research and Consulting Company in Geneva with fiber size measurements made by Schuller Mountain Technical Center in Denver, CO. In this study, rats were exposed for 5 days to 4 types of airborne, respirable-sized MMVF and to crocidolite asbestos fibers. The MMVF included two compositions of glass wool, and one each of rock and slag wool. After exposure, animals were sacrificed at intervals up to 18 mo, and the number, length, and diameter of a representative sample of fibers in their lungs were measured. These data show that the long fibers (>20 μm) are eliminated from the rats' lungs at a rate that is predicted from the dissolution rate measured in vitro for these fiber compositions. In particular, the long MMVF were nearly completely eliminated in several months, whereas the long crocidolite asbestos fibers remained in significant numbers at the end of the study. The number, length, and diameter distributions of fibers remaining in the rats' lungs agreed well with a computer simulation of fiber clearance. This simulation assumed that the long fibers dissolved at the rate measured for each fiber in vitro, and that the short fibers of every type were removed at the same rate as short crocidol…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies conducted with crocidolite fibers showed a lower retention of fibers < 5 μm compared to fibers > 5 μm or > 20 μm [112,113] or to WHO fibers [114].”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [112]
In the citing paper
“In conclusion, the analysis of 5 publications related to nose-only exposure of amphiboles in rats, demonstrated a lower biopersistence of SAF than LAF [102,112-114,116], in agreement with other results using long-term inhalation exposure.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bernstein D. M., 1992, Environ. Health Perspect., 102, 15, 10.1289/ehp.94102s515 · DOI · Paper page
- Eastes W., 1994, Inhal. Toxicol., 7, 197, 10.3109/08958379509029093 · DOI
- Hamilton R. D., 1994, Health Perspect., 102, 109, 10.1289/ehp.94102s5109 · DOI
- Hesterberg T. W., 1993, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 20, 464, 10.1006/faat.1993.1057 · DOI · Paper page
- Mattson S. M, 1994, Environ. Health Perspect., 102, 87, 10.1289/ehp.94102s587 · DOI
- Musselman R. P., 1994, Environ. Health Perspect., 102, 139, 10.1289/ehp.94102s5139 · DOI · Paper page
- Potter R. M., 1991, Glastech. Ber., 64, 16
- Scholze H, 1988, Glastech. Ber., 61, 161
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
BIOPERSISTENCE, FIBER LENGTH, AND CANCER RISK ASSESSMENT FOR INHALED FIBERS
Moolgavkar, S. H., Brown, R. C., & Turim, J. (2001) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/089583701316941294 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Eastes, W., & Hadiey, J. G.
- Venue
- Inhalation Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-196
- ISSN
- 0895-8378
- 1091-7691
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review