The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Open accessAbstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) can manifest as a spectrum of clinical syndromes, ranging from behavioural impairment to language or motor dysfunction. Recently, revised diagnostic criteria have been proposed for the behavioural and progressive aphasia syndromes associated with frontotemporal degeneration. The present review will summarize these diagnostic guidelines and highlight some lingering controversies in the classification of FTLD clinical syndromes. We will discuss common tools and methods used to identify the insidious changes of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), the value of new, patient-based tasks of orbitofrontal function, and the issue of a benign or 'phenocopy' variant of bvFTD. With regard to primary progressive aphasia (PPA), we will discuss the scope of the semantic disorder in semantic-variant PPA, the nature of the speech disorder in non-fluent, agrammatic PPA, and the preliminary utility of a logopenic PPA classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clinical diagnosis of the FTD variants was based on current criteria (Armstrong et al., 2013; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Rascovsky & Grossman, 2013; Rascovsky et al., 2011).”
From Multiclass characterization of frontotemporal dementia variants via multimodal brain network computational inference (2023) · cites this paper as Rascovsky & Grossman, 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308 · Cited by 7,568
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · Cited by 6,128
Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia
Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J. R., Knopman, D., Mendez, M. F., Kramer, J. H., Neuhaus, J., van Swieten, J. C., Seelaar, H., Dopper, E. G. P., Onyike, C. U., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr179 · Cited by 5,221
Self-citationClassification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141
Self-citationFrontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria
Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., Freedman, M., Kertesz, A., Robert, P. H., Albert, M., et al. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.6.1546 · Cited by 5,047
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 1×
“ToM is defi ned as the ability to assess the desires, beliefs and intentions of other people and is thought to be critically subserved by rostral aspects of the medial prefrontal cortex (Amodio & Frith, 2006).”
BackgroundWeıntraub, S. (1990) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1990.00530120075013 · Cited by 3,018
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Duda, J.T., Avants, B., Asmuth, J.A., Zhang, H., Grossman, M. & Gee, J.C. (2008). A fiber tractography-based examination of neurodegeneration on language-network neuroanatomy. Medical Imaging Computation and Computer-Assisted Analysis, 191–198.
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252820.81313.9b · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Neurology and Epidemiology of the Major Neurodegenerative DiseasesPreprint
Erkkinen, M. G., Kim, M., & Geschwind, M. D. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033118 · Cited by 1,231
Gale, S. A., Acar, D., & Daffner, K. R. (2018) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.022 · Cited by 788
The Prevalence and Incidence of Frontotemporal Dementia: a Systematic Review
Hogan, D. B., Jetté, N., Fiest, K. M., Roberts, J. I., Pearson, D. M., Smith, E. E., Roach, P., Kirk, A., Pringsheim, T. M., & Maxwell, C. J. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/cjn.2016.25 · Cited by 286
López, O. L., & Kuller, L. H. (2019) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804766-8.00009-1 · Cited by 196
Ferrari, L. D., Huang, S., Magnani, G., Ambrosi, A., Comı, G., & Leocani, L. (2017) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160886 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Rascovsky, K., & Grossman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rascovsky, Katya
- ORCID
- Grossman, Murray
- Venue
- International Review of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-158
- ISSN
- 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-1627
- PMC
- PMC3906583
- OpenAlex
- W2170424118
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 152
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG15116, AG-32953, R01AG015116, P01AG017586, AG17586, P01AG032953)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS53488, NS-44266, P50NS053488, R01NS044266)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- frontotemporal lobar degeneration, diagnostic criteria, clinical classification, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, semantic variant PPA, phenocopy, behavioural impairment, language disorders
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Adjustment, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Executive Function, Theory of Mind, Emotional Intelligence, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
