Cited by 77Health Policy Implementation ScienceDisability Education and EmploymentMental Health and Patient Involvement

Implementing the individual placement and support (IPS) approach for people with mental health conditions in England

Rinaldi, Miles, Miller, Lynne, Perkins, Rachel·2010·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Despite the overwhelming evidence of the effectiveness of the individual placement and support (IPS) approach to vocational rehabilitation for people with mental health conditions, there is very limited evidence of implementation in the UK. Both government policy and national clinical guidelines have set out a need for the availability of this effective approach in favour of other approaches, yet implementation appears to be an exception rather than a rule. This paper sets out four key challenges to implementing the IPS approach within mental health services in England: fear on the part of professionals, individuals and their families; a culture of low expectations; a failure to provide the support that we know works, and the global 'credit crunch' recession. Using a framework from implementation science, this review identifies the key features of implementing IPS within routine clinical practice from the experience of two large mental health NHS trusts in England.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09540261003720456

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 77

Authors
Rinaldi, M., Miller, L., & Perkins, R.
Affiliations
  • South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Rinaldi, Miles
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2010-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
163-172
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W2041303370
Cited by
77
References
64
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, mental health services, vocational rehabilitation, implementation barriers, implementation science, mental health policy, clinical guidelines, professional attitudes, low expectations, economic recession, NHS trusts, England
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Employment, England, Humans, Mental Health Services, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review