Implementing the individual placement and support (IPS) approach for people with mental health conditions in England
Abstract
Despite the overwhelming evidence of the effectiveness of the individual placement and support (IPS) approach to vocational rehabilitation for people with mental health conditions, there is very limited evidence of implementation in the UK. Both government policy and national clinical guidelines have set out a need for the availability of this effective approach in favour of other approaches, yet implementation appears to be an exception rather than a rule. This paper sets out four key challenges to implementing the IPS approach within mental health services in England: fear on the part of professionals, individuals and their families; a culture of low expectations; a failure to provide the support that we know works, and the global 'credit crunch' recession. Using a framework from implementation science, this review identifies the key features of implementing IPS within routine clinical practice from the experience of two large mental health NHS trusts in England.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A further study of standard IPS for young people with first episode psychosis found employment or education rates improved by 43% over 18 months (baseline = 38%; 18 months = 81%).
“Over an 18 month period the employment or education rates improved by 43% (baseline = 38%; 18mths = 81).”
From An enhanced individual placement and support (iPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Rinaldi, M., Miller, L., & Perkins, R.
- Affiliations
- South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rinaldi, Miles
- Venue
- International Review of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-172
- ISSN
- 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-1627
- OpenAlex
- W2041303370
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- Individual Placement and Support, mental health services, vocational rehabilitation, implementation barriers, implementation science, mental health policy, clinical guidelines, professional attitudes, low expectations, economic recession, NHS trusts, England
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Employment, England, Humans, Mental Health Services, Social Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review