Cited by 38Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and Access

Jigsaw: Engaging communities in the development and implementation of youth mental health services and supports in the Republic of Ireland

Illback, Robert J., Bates, Tony, Hodges, Craig, Galligan, Karen, Smith, Patrick, Sanders, Daniel, Dooley, Barbara·2010·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

Background Irish young people exhibit high levels of psychological distress, but community-based services and supports are often unavailable or inaccessible. Aim To describe efforts to engage communities in systematic and data-based processes of planning, programme design, implementation, and evaluation. Method Details system-building initiatives in five communities (four counties and a distressed urban site) that will serve as a springboard for full national deployment. Results Extensive community engagement and planning has occurred in all sites, systems change efforts grounded in detailed business plans have begun, and process and outcome evaluation is underway. Conclusion Needs and resource assessment processes confirmed the magnitude of need, but also suggested the creative re-allocation of local resources. Young people provided invaluable guidance for system design. Creating and sustaining a culture of innovation at each site was challenging, requiring leadership and continuous dialogue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638231003728141

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other jurisdictions have implemented variations of similar integrated youth mental health care models, adapted to local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors.

    “Other jurisdictions-notably, Ireland, 289 Canada, 290-292 the UK, 293,294 Denmark, Singapore, 295 the USA, the Netherlands, 296 Japan, 297 South Korea, 298 Israel, 299 Hong Kong, 300 Iceland, France, 301 and New Zealand 302 -have implemented variations of similar models, which have been adapted to meet local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors (panel”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [289]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Illback, R. J., Bates, T., Hodges, C., Galligan, K., Smith, P., Sanders, D., & Dooley, B.
Corresponding author
Illback, Robert J.
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2010-09-13
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
422-435
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2004537473
Cited by
38
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
child and adolescent mental health services, community participation, service development, system change, needs assessment, resource reallocation, mental health service delivery, Irish youth
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Health Plan Implementation, Health Planning, Humans, Ireland, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Models, Organizational, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review