Cited by 40Physical Activity and HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient Involvement

The impact of exercise projects to promote mental wellbeing

Malcolm, Estelle, Evans-Lacko, Sara, Little, Kirsty, Henderson, Claire, Thornicroft, Graham·2013·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a well-established link between physical activity and psychological wellbeing, but less evidence on whether it can increase comfort in disclosure of mental health problems and help to reduce the perceived stigma of mental illness. AIMS: To investigate whether exercise projects, funded by the time to change anti-stigma programme to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination in England, can improve (1) wellbeing, (2) participation in physical activity, (3) readiness to disclose mental health problems or (4) perceived reduction in levels of stigma and discrimination. METHODS: Participants of exercise projects run in routine community settings by local Mind and Rethink Mental Illness associations completed the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and questions addressing the other three outcomes at baseline and three month follow-up (N = 2663 baseline; N = 531 three month follow-up). RESULTS: There was significant improvement at three months on the WEMWBS (t(386) = -7.64, p = <0.001, r = 0.36); readiness to disclose (χ(2)(1) = 10.86, p = 0.001) and participation in physical activity outside of the project (χ(2)(1) = 12.01, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based exercise projects have the potential to produce multifaceted positive outcomes for people with mental health problems; however, more methodologically robust studies are needed to adequately determine the effects of exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2013.841874

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 40

Authors
Malcolm, E., Evans-Lacko, S., Little, K., Henderson, C., & Thornicroft, G.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Malcolm, Estelle
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2013-11-26
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
519-527
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2081969017
Cited by
40
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Comic Relief
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1053, NF-SI-0611-10053)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
psychological well-being, mental health stigma, physical activity participation, community-based exercise, mental health discrimination, community mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Exercise, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review