The impact of exercise projects to promote mental wellbeing
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a well-established link between physical activity and psychological wellbeing, but less evidence on whether it can increase comfort in disclosure of mental health problems and help to reduce the perceived stigma of mental illness. AIMS: To investigate whether exercise projects, funded by the time to change anti-stigma programme to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination in England, can improve (1) wellbeing, (2) participation in physical activity, (3) readiness to disclose mental health problems or (4) perceived reduction in levels of stigma and discrimination. METHODS: Participants of exercise projects run in routine community settings by local Mind and Rethink Mental Illness associations completed the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and questions addressing the other three outcomes at baseline and three month follow-up (N = 2663 baseline; N = 531 three month follow-up). RESULTS: There was significant improvement at three months on the WEMWBS (t(386) = -7.64, p = <0.001, r = 0.36); readiness to disclose (χ(2)(1) = 10.86, p = 0.001) and participation in physical activity outside of the project (χ(2)(1) = 12.01, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based exercise projects have the potential to produce multifaceted positive outcomes for people with mental health problems; however, more methodologically robust studies are needed to adequately determine the effects of exercise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For adults, depression is usually regarded as the mental health problem most likely to be positively affected by exercise.
“For adults, depression is usually regarded as the mental health problem most likely to be positively affected by exercise [20].”
From Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on depression in adolescents (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Malcolm, E., Evans-Lacko, S., Little, K., Henderson, C., & Thornicroft, G.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Malcolm, Estelle
- Venue
- Journal of Mental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 519-527
- ISSN
- 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0567
- OpenAlex
- W2081969017
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Comic Relief
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1053, NF-SI-0611-10053)
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- psychological well-being, mental health stigma, physical activity participation, community-based exercise, mental health discrimination, community mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Exercise, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review