The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe current societal perceptions and attitudes towards sexuality and disability and how social stigma differs between individuals living with visible and invisible disabilities. METHOD: A qualitative approach was used to explore attitudes and perceptions towards sexuality and disability. Focus groups were conducted with the following groups: service providers, people with visible disabilities, people with invisible disabilities and the general public. The focus group participants viewed 'Sexability' a documentary film on sexuality and disability to stimulate discussion midway through the session. RESULTS: Findings suggest that individuals with disabilities are commonly viewed as asexual due to a predominant heteronormative idea of sex and what is considered natural. A lack of information and education on sexuality and disability was felt to be a major contributing factors towards the stigma attached to disability and sexuality. CONCLUSIONS: Stigma can lead individuals to internalise concepts of asexuality and may negatively impact confidence, desire and ability to find a partner while distorting one's overall sexual self-concept. Societal attitudes and perceptions are driven by education and knowledge, if there is no exposure to sexuality and disability, it follows suit that society would have a narrow understanding of these issues. Further research should focus on how best to educate and inform all members of society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. E. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,611
A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research
Burnard, P. (1991) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-y · Cited by 2,510
Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation.
Rist, R. C., Miller, N., & Brewer, M. B. (1985) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069567 · Cited by 544
Manen, M. V. (1997) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239700700303 · Cited by 503
Disabled Sexuality: Toward Rights and Recognition
Shakespeare, T. (2000) · Sexuality and Disability · doi:10.1023/a:1026409613684 · Cited by 333
Sexuality of Children and Adolescents With Developmental Disabilities
Murphy, N. A., Elias, E. R., & for the Council on Children With Disabilities (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1115 · Cited by 286
The Myth of Asexuality: A Survey of Social and Empirical Evidence
Milligan, M. S., & Neufeldt, A. H. (2001) · Sexuality and Disability · doi:10.1023/a:1010621705591 · Cited by 253
Davis, N. A. (2005) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/453151 · Cited by 197
Reactions to invisible disability: The experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke
Dale Stone, S. (2005) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280400008990 · Cited by 166
Galvin, R. (2005) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00448.x · Cited by 128
Cited by
Wachs, S., Wright, M. F., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Döring, N. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052597 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Esmail, S., Dary, K., Walter, A., & Knupp, H.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1148-1155
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2119193868
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/09638280903419277
- The paper
- Esmail, S., Dary, K., Walter, A., & Knupp, H. (2010). Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903419277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.