Missed Diagnosis of Autism in an Australian Indigenous Psychiatric Population
Abstract
Objective The aim of this paper is to review the diagnosis among adult Indigenous patients from the Kimberley region of Western Australia who had an existing diagnosis of schizophrenia. A visit from a psychiatrist specializing in intellectual disability provided the opportunity for conducting psychiatric assessments from a developmental perspective. Method Selected patients with schizophrenia were assessed from an intellectual disability perspective from an active case load of 215 patients. Result Thirteen out of 14 selected patients were considered to have a diagnosis of autism when a developmental history was undertaken. Case studies are presented to illustrate the overlap in symptoms and potential for the diagnosis of autism to be missed. Conclusions Autism spectrum disorders may be missed in Indigenous population groups. This has implications for treatment and service provision. Clinicians need to be mindful of the diagnostic possibility that an autism spectrum disorder might be masquerading as schizophrenia in the context of intellectual disability and atypical presentation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meera Roy and Balaratnasingam (2010) identified 11 autistic Indigenous Australian adults who were previously misdiagnosed with schizophrenia at a remote area mental health service.
“Meera Roy and Balaratnasingam (2010) identified 11 autistic Indigenous Australian adults who were previously misdiagnosed with schizophrenia at a remote area mental health service.”
From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Meera Roy and Balaratnasingam (2010)
Autism diagnosis was confirmed, and schizophrenia disconfirmed in 13 of the 14 adults suspected of autism.
“Autism diagnosis was confirmed, and schizophrenia disconfirmed in 13 of the 14 adults suspected of autism.”
From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Meera Roy and Balaratnasingam (2010)
8 had co-occurring ID.
“8 had co- occurring ID.”
From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as Meera Roy and Balaratnasingam (2010)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Roy, M., & Balaratnasingam, S.
- Affiliations
- South Birmingham Primary Care Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Kimberley Mental Health and Drug Service, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Balaratnasingam, Sivasankaran
- Venue
- Australasian Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 534-537
- ISSN
- 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1665
- OpenAlex
- W2127677154
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, missed diagnosis, schizophrenia, Indigenous Australians, intellectual disability, developmental assessment, atypical presentation, diagnostic overlap, Kimberley region
- MeSH terms
- Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Western Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review