Cited by 105Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityTrace Elements in Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Clinical Biochemistry of Aluminum

King, Steven W., Savory, John, Wills, Michael R., Gitelman, H. J.·1981·CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences

Abstract

The methods for aluminum analysis vary from the simple and often nonspecific chemical and physical procedures to the highly sophisticated types such as neutron activation and atomic absorption spectrometry. Atomic absorption procedures are the techniques of choice for most routine hospital laboratories. The wide distribution of aluminum in nature can create severe contamination problems in aluminum analysis. Procedures to avoid contamination are discussed. In recent years aluminum has been implicated as a possible etiological agent in DES and in Alzheimer's Disease. A common finding in these two conditions is an elevated brain aluminum content. The patients with Alzheimer's Disease develop characteristic neurofibrillary tangles which lead to the degeneration of the affected neurons. Similar tangles can be induced in laboratory animals injected intracerebrally with aluminum salts. Even though the laboratory animals develop tangles resembling those seen in patients with Alzheimer's Disease, no evidence has been published to show that the tangles seen in Alzheimer's Disease are induced by the elevated brain aluminum content. Although there are some similar clinical symptoms in both Alzheimer's Disease and DES, the hemodialysis patients with DES do not develop neurofibrillary tangles despite an elevated brain aluminum content. The significance of this difference is not understood. The sources of the increase in tissue aluminum levels found in hemodialysis patients are from the gastrointestinal absorption of aluminum in aluminum containing phosphate-binding gels and by transfer from the dialyzate to the blood during the hemodialysis procedure. Plasma aluminum values may be reduced by the administration of a minimum dosage of phosphate-binding gels and by the use of purified water to make up the dialysate. The incidence of DES is reduced by the use of these procedures to maintain the hemodialysis patients' plasma aluminum at a low concentration. The increased brain aluminum content of patients with Alzheimer's Disease is derived from the environment. Because of the ubiquitous occurrence of aluminum, we are exposed to it daily in our food, water, and in the air. The low levels of aluminum absorbed from the environment may explain why susceptible patients do not develop Alzheimer's Disease until after many years of exposure, if indeed aluminum is the etiological agent in Alzheimer's Disease. The many papers that have been published concerning aluminum, DES, and Alzheimer's Disease make a strong case for linking elevated tissue aluminum content with these conditions. However, conclusive evidence to support this theory has not been published. Until the effect of aluminum on cellular chemistry is more fully understood, the possibility that DES and Alzheimer's Disease may result from other causes or from aluminum and another agent acting concomitantly must be considered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10408368109105861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Alfrey A. C., 1976, N. Eng. J. Med., 298, 184, 10.1056/NEJM197601222940402 · DOI
  2. Alfrey A. C, 1978, Ann. Rev. Med., 29, 93, 10.1146/annurev.me.29.020178.000521 · DOI
  3. Elliott H. L., 1978, Lancet, 2, 1255, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92128-1 · DOI
  4. Parkinson I. S., 1979, Lancet, 1, 406, 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)90883-3 · DOI
  5. Crapper D. R., 1973, Science, 180, 511, 10.1126/science.180.4085.511 · DOI
  6. McDermott J. R., 1978, Lancet, 1, 901, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90681-5 · DOI
  7. Berlyne G. M., 1970, Lancet, 2, 494, 10.1016/S0140-6736(70)90113-3 · DOI
  8. Kechny W. D., 1977, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 296, 1389
  9. Recker R. R., 1977, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 92, 810
  10. Kaehny W. D., 1977, Kidney Int., 12, 361, 10.1038/ki.1977.123 · DOI
  11. Kovalchik M. T., 1978, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 92, 712
  12. Garmestani K., 1978, Anal. Chem., 50, 144, 10.1021/ac50023a032 · DOI
  13. Terai M., 1977, Radioanal. Chem., 37, 599, 10.1007/BF02519372 · DOI
  14. Blotcky A. J., 1976, Anal. Chem., 48, 1084, 10.1021/ac60371a028 · DOI
  15. Ihnat M, 1976, Anal. Biochem., 73, 120, 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90148-2 · DOI
  16. Alderman F. R., 1980, Clin. Chem., 26, 258, 10.1093/clinchem/26.2.258 · DOI
  17. Gorsky J. E., 1978, Clin. Chem., 24, 1485, 10.1093/clinchem/24.9.1485 · DOI
  18. Arieff A. I., 1979, Ann. Intern. Med., 90, 741, 10.7326/0003-4819-90-5-741 · DOI
  19. Spofforth J, 1921, Lancet, 1, 1301, 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)24927-7 · DOI
  20. Betts C. T, 1926, Aluminum Poisoning
  21. Kehoe R. A., 1940, J. Nutr., 19, 579, 10.1093/jn/19.6.579 · DOI
  22. Klatzo I., 1965, J. Neuropathology. Exp. Neurol., 24, 187, 10.1097/00005072-196504000-00002 · DOI
  23. Parsons V., 1971, Br. Med. J., 4, 273, 10.1136/bmj.4.5782.273 · DOI
  24. Clarkson E. M., 1972, Clin. Sci., 43, 519, 10.1042/cs0430519 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00002480-197201000-00064 · DOI
  26. Berlyne G. M., 1972, Lancet, 1, 564, 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90357-1 · DOI
  27. Cam J. M., 1976, Clin. Sci. Mol. Med., 51, 407
  28. Gosrsky J. E., 1979, Clirt. Chem., 25, 1739, 10.1093/clinchem/25.10.1739 · DOI
  29. Myor G. H., 1977, Science, 197, 1187, 10.1126/science.897661 · DOI
  30. Salvadeo A., 1979, Science, 197, 1187
  31. Allain P., 1978, Nouv. Presse Med., 7, 92
  32. Gacek E. M., 1979, Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, 25, 409, 10.1097/00002480-197902500-00079 · DOI
  33. Flendrig J. A., 1976, Lancet, 2, 1235, 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92177-2 · DOI
  34. Lundin A. P., 1978, Clin. Res., 26, 636A
  35. Berlyne G. M, 1978, Lancet, 2, 1155, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92320-6 · DOI
  36. Elliott H. L., 1978, Lancet, 2, 940, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)91654-9 · DOI
  37. King S. W., 1961, Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. pharmacol., 26, 161
  38. Dent C. E., 1961, Q. J. Med., 30, 1, 10.1016/0002-9343(61)90059-6 · DOI
  39. Dent C. E., 1974, Br. Med. J., 1, 551, 10.1136/bmj.1.5907.551 · DOI
  40. Baker L. R. I., 1974, Br. Med. J., 3, 150, 10.1136/bmj.3.5924.150 · DOI
  41. Platts M. M., 1977, Br. Med. J., 2, 657, 10.1136/bmj.2.6088.657 · DOI
  42. Ward M. K. H. A., 1978, Lancet, 1, 841, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90191-5 · DOI
  43. Cournot-Witmer G., 1979, Lancet, 2, 795, 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)92143-3 · DOI
  44. Burks J., 1974, Neurology, 24, 359
  45. Baratt L. A., 1975, Aust. N. Z. J. Med., 5, 62, 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1975.tb03257.x · DOI
  46. Wardle E. N, 1973, Lancet, 2, 47, 10.1016/S0140-6736(73)91987-9 · DOI
  47. Mahurkar S. D., 1973, Lancet, 1, 1412, 10.1016/S0140-6736(73)91740-6 · DOI
  48. Buge A., 1979, Nouv. Presse Med., 8, 1071
  49. Duenea G., 1978, Ann. Intern. Med., 88, 502, 10.7326/0003-4819-88-4-502 · DOI
  50. Mahukar S. D., 1978, J. Dialysis, 2, 447, 10.3109/08860227809080098 · DOI
  51. Rozas V. V., 1978, Arch. Int. Med., 138, 1375, 10.1001/archinte.1978.03630340045015 · DOI
  52. Elliott H. L., 1978, Br. Med. J., 1, 1101, 10.1136/bmj.1.6120.1101 · DOI
  53. Nadel A. M., 1976, Neorology, 26, 1130, 10.1212/WNL.26.12.1130 · DOI
  54. Snider W. D., 1979, Neurology, 29, 414, 10.1212/WNL.29.3.414 · DOI
  55. Masselot J. P., 1978, Lancet, 2, 1386, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92031-7 · DOI
  56. Poisson M., 1978, Br. Med. J., 2, 1610, 10.1136/bmj.2.6152.1610 · DOI
  57. Buge A., 1979, Nouv. Presse Med., 8, 2729
  58. Sullivan P. A., 1977, Br. Med. J., 2, 740, 10.1136/bmj.2.6089.740 · DOI
  59. Burks J. S., 1978, Lancet, 1, 764
  60. Graf H., 1979, Lancet, 1, 379, 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)92916-7 · DOI
  61. Galle P., 1979, Nouv. Presse Med., 24, 4091
  62. De Boni U., 1974, Histochemistry, 40, 31, 10.1007/BF00490271 · DOI
  63. Womack F. C., 1979, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 76, 5080, 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5080 · DOI
  64. Lai J. C., 1980, Biochem. Pharmacol., 29, 141, 10.1016/0006-2952(80)90321-4 · DOI
  65. Bòone I., 1979, Lancet, 1, 782, 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)91241-8 · DOI
  66. Leeming R. J., 1979, Lancet, 1, 559
  67. Cameron K. R., 1978, Lancet, 2, 796, 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92691-0 · DOI
  68. Mahurkar S. D., 1978, Kidney Int., 13, 306, 10.1038/ki.1978.44 · DOI
  69. Crapper D. R., 1978, Can. Psychiatr. Assoc. J., 23, 229, 10.1177/070674377802300406 · DOI
  70. Trapp G. A., 1978, Biol. Psychiatry, 13, 709
  71. Terry R. D., 1965, J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 24, 200, 10.1097/00005072-196504000-00003 · DOI
  72. Craper D. R., 1976, Brain, 99, 67, 10.1093/brain/99.1.67 · DOI
  73. Tipton I. H., 1959, Oak Ridge Nat. Lab. Rep
  74. McLaughlin A. I. G., 1962, Br. J. Ind. Med., 19, 253
  75. Crapper D. R., 1976, Aging, 7, 471
  76. Crapper D. R, 1976, Neurobiology of Agin, 405
  77. Iqbal K., 1976, Neurobiology of Aging, 351
  78. Petit T. L., 1980, Exp. Neurol., 67, 152, 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90166-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
King, S. W., Savory, J., Wills, M. R., & Gitelman, H. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia Medical Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Published
1981-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
0590-8191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001244795
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
Keywords
aluminum, atomic absorption spectrometry, neutron activation analysis, Alzheimer's disease, neurofibrillary tangles, hemodialysis, plasma aluminum
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Biochemistry of Aluminum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10408368109105861
The paper
King, S. W., Savory, J., Wills, M. R., & Gitelman, H. J. (1981). The Clinical Biochemistry of Aluminum. CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408368109105861