Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,681

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential Staining of Aborted and Nonaborted Pollen

Alexander, M. P.·1969·Stain Technology

Abstract

A single staining solution was made by compounding it in the following order (dyes were from British Drug Houses): ethanol, 10 ml; 1% malachite green in 95% ethanol, 1 ml; distilled water, 50 ml; glycerol 25 ml; phenol, 5 gm; chloral hydrate, 5 gm; acid fuchsin 1% in water, 5 ml; orange G, 1% in water 0.5 ml; and glacial acetic acid, 1–4 ml. For best results in differentiation to give green pollen walls and red protoplasm, the staining solution should be acidified with glacial acetic acid. The amount of acid to be added depends upon thickness of the pollen walls: for very thin-walled pollen, 1 ml; for moderately thin walls, 2 ml; and for thick-walled or spiny-walled pollen, 3 ml of acid. For pollen inside non-dehiscent anthers, 4 ml of acid should be used. Staining is hastened by flaming the slide (for loose thin-walled pollen) or by immersing thick-walled pollen or anthers for 24–48 hr at 50 C. In the typical stain, aborted pollen grains are green; nonaborted, red. The method is useful for pollen inside nondehiscent anthers if these are small and not too deeply coloured naturally. The stain is very durable, especially if the coverslips are sealed with param wax. The staining solution will keep well for about a month. It is useful both for angiosperms and gymnosperm microgametes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10520296909063335

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,681

Metadata

Authors
Alexander, M. P.
Venue
Stain Technology
Published
1969-01
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
117-122
ISSN
0038-9153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047247736
Cited by
1,681
References
0
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Staining of Aborted and Nonaborted Pollen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10520296909063335
The paper
Alexander, M. P. (1969). Differential Staining of Aborted and Nonaborted Pollen. Stain Technology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296909063335

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.